The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Laparoscopic Liver Resections: A Feasibility Study in 30 Patients
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resections. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The use of the laparoscopic approach for liver resections has remained limited for technical reasons. Progress in laparoscopic procedures and the development of dedicated technology have made it possible to consider laparoscopic resection in selected patients. METHODS: A prospective study of laparoscopic liver resections was undertaken in patients with preoperative diagnoses including benign lesion, hepatocellular carcinoma with compensated cirrhosis, and metastasis of noncolorectal origin. Hepatic involvement had to be limited and located in the left or peripheral right segments (segments 2-6), and the tumor had to be 5 cm or smaller. Surgical technique included CO2 pneumoperitoneum and liver transection with a harmonic scalpel, with or without portal triad clamping or hepatic vein control. Portal pedicles and large hepatic veins were stapled. Resected specimens were placed in a bag and removed through a separate incision, without fragmentation. RESULTS: From May 1996 to December 1999, 30 of 159 (19%) liver resections were included. There were 18 benign lesions and 12 malignant tumors, including 8 hepatocellular carcinomas in cirrhotic patients. Mean tumor size was 4.25 cm. There were two conversions to laparotomy (6.6%). The resections included 1 left hepatectomy, 8 bisegmentectomies (2 and 3), 9 segmentectomies, and 11 atypical resections. Mean blood loss was 300 mL. Mean surgical time was 214 minutes. There were no deaths. Complications occurred in six patients (20%). Only one cirrhotic patient developed postoperative ascites. No port-site metastases were observed in patients with malignant disease. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic resections are feasible and safe in selected patients with left-sided and right-peripheral lesions requiring limited resection. Young patients with benign disease clearly benefit from avoiding a major abdominal incision, and cirrhotic patients may have a reduced complication rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing
Ciria, R., Cherqui, D., Geller, D. A., Briceno, J., & Wakabayashi, G. (2016) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000001413 · Cited by 747
Self-citationVibert, E., Perniceni, T., Levard, H., Denet, C., Shahri, N. K., & Gayet, B. (2006) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.5150 · Cited by 377
Kasai, M., Van Damme, N., Berardi, G., Geboes, K., Laurent, S., & Troisi, R. I. (2018) · Acta Chirurgica Belgica · doi:10.1080/00015458.2017.1407118 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Cherqui, D., Husson, E., Hammoud, R., Malassagne, B., Stéphan, F., Bensaid, S., Rotman, N., & Fagniez, P.-L.
- Venue
- Annals of Surgery
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 232
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 753-762
- ISSN
- 0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087744580
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic Liver Resections: A Feasibility Study in 30 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00000658-200012000-00004
- The paper
- Cherqui, D., Husson, E., Hammoud, R., Malassagne, B., Stéphan, F., Bensaid, S., Rotman, N., & Fagniez, P.-L. (2000). Laparoscopic Liver Resections: A Feasibility Study in 30 Patients. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200012000-00004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.