Cited by 299Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive and Behavioral Outcome Following Mild Traumatic Head Injury in Children

Abstract

Objectives To investigate outcome in children with mild traumatic head injury (THI) at 1 week and 3 months postinjury and to identify factors associated with persisting problems. Design Postconcussional symptomatology, behavior ratings, and neuropsychological test performance were examined at 1 week and 3 months postinjury. Setting Participants were recruited from successive presentations to emergency departments of two major hospitals. Participants 130 Children with mild THI were compared with 96 children having other minor injuries as controls. Results Children with mild THI experienced headaches, dizziness, and fatigue but exhibited no cognitive impairments, relative to controls, at 1 week postinjury. By 3 months, symptoms had resolved. However, 17% of children showed significant ongoing problems. They were more likely to have a history of previous head injury, learning difficulties, neurological or psychiatric problems, or family stressors. Conclusions Persisting problems following mild head injury in children are more common in those with previous head injury, preexisting learning difficulties, or neurological, psychiatric, or family problems. These "at-risk" children should be identified in the emergency department and monitored.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001199-199908000-00005

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fletcher, 1990, J Consult Clin Psychol, 58, 93, 10.1037/0022-006X.58.1.93 · DOI
  2. Fay, 1993, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, 895
  3. Ewing-Cobbs, 1990, Neurosurgery, 27, 683, 10.1227/00006123-199011000-00003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 298

Metadata

Authors
Ponsford, J., Willmott, C., Rothwell, A., Cameron, P., Ayton, G., Nelms, R., Curran, C., & Ng, K. T.
Affiliations
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Ponsford, Jennie
Venue
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Published
1999-08
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
360-372
ISSN
0885-9701 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066016680
Cited by
299
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
concussion, children, cognitive outcomes, behavioral effects, learning difficulties, family stress, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Mental Disorders, Brain Concussion, Brain Diseases, Child, Child Behavior, Cognition, Dizziness, Family Relations, Fatigue, Follow-Up Studies, Craniocerebral Trauma, Headache, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review