Cited by 6Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchWilliams Syndrome Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Genetics of autism

Todd, Richard D., Hudziak, James J.·1993·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

Recent clinical and family studies of autism and fragile X syndrome are reviewed in the context of determining the mode of transmission of autism. Current data are not compatible with simple Mendelian transmission models. Other processes such as genetic anticipation and imprinting may be involved.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001504-199308000-00005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Todd, R. D., & Hudziak, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Hudziak, James J.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
1993-08
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
486-488
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026375163
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, fragile X syndrome, mode of inheritance, genetic anticipation, genomic imprinting, Mendelian inheritance, family studies, medical genetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review