Cited by 22Obesity, Physical Activity, DietPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentEating Disorders and Behaviors

Etiology and treatment of obesity

Wadden, Thomas A.·1993·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

Practitioners, the media, and the public are re-evaluating the treatment of obesity in view of findings that most weight reduction efforts are ultimately unsuccessful and may be associated with adverse health effects. This article reviews these findings, discusses methods of identifying those persons most in need of weight reduction, and examines important developments in treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001504-199312000-00015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wadden, T. A.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Wadden, Thomas A.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
1993-12
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
816-820
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972955943
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2012: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
obesity, obesity etiology, obesity treatment, weight loss, treatment failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review