The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of a Brief Telephone Questionnaire to Estimate Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Diverse Study Populations
Abstract
We evaluated the use of a six-item telephone questionnaire to estimate fruit and vegetable intakes in five diverse populations. Researchers administered the telephone questionnaire to persons who had previously undergone more extensive dietary assessment. The study population included 553 middle-aged and older adults in Beaver Dam, WI; 252 middle-aged and older women throughout Wisconsin; 150 parents of school children in Augusta, GA; 73 low-income, Hispanic mothers in Chicago, IL; and 51 older adults in Arizona. Spearman correlation coefficients between total fruit and vegetable intakes measured by the brief telephone survey and by more extensive food frequency questionnaires were 0.47 (Augusta), 0.48 (Arizona), 0.56 (Wisconsin), and 0.57 (Beaver Dam). Correlations between intakes measured by the brief telephone survey and by multiple diet records or recalls were 0.29 (Arizona), 0.46 (Chicago), and 0.54 (Beaver Dam). With the exception of Arizona, mean daily fruit and vegetable intakes measured by the telephone survey were similar to intakes estimated by multiple diet records or recalls and lower than those estimated by extensive food frequency questionnaires. Although caution may be needed in interpreting dietary reports from some ethnic subgroups, this brief telephone questionnaire may be useful for surveillance of fruit and vegetable intake in the United States.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire
WILLETT, W. C., SAMPSON, L., STAMPFER, M. J., ROSNER, B., BAIN, C., WITSCHI, J., HENNEKENS, C. H., & SPEIZER, F. E. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114086 · Cited by 4,274
Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records
Block, G., Woods, M., Potosky, A., & Clifford, C. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90099-b · Cited by 1,197
A REVIEW OF VALIDATIONS OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODS
BLOCK, G. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113331 · Cited by 823
Self-citation
Cited by
Dietary Assessment Methodology
Thompson, F. E., & Subar, A. F. (2017) · Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802928-2.00001-1 · Cited by 913
Resnicow, K., Jackson, A., Wang, T., De, A. K., McCarty, F., Dudley, W. N., & Baranowski, T. (2001) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.91.10.1686 · Cited by 495
Validation of the Radimer/Cornell Measures of Hunger and Food Insecurity
Kendall, A., Olson, C. M., & Frongillo, E. A. (1995) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/125.11.2793 · Cited by 364
Campbell, M. K., Demark-Wahnefried, W., Symons, M., Kalsbeek, W. D., Dodds, J., Cowan, A., Jackson, B., Motsinger, B., Hoben, K., Lashley, J., et al. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.9.1390 · Cited by 347
Neuhouser, M. L., Thompson, B., Coronado, G. D., & Solomon, C. C. (2004) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2003.10.015 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Serdula, M., Coates, R., Byes, T., Mokdad, A., Jewell, S., Chavez, N., Mares-Perlman, J., Newcomb, P., Ritenbaugh, C., Treiber, F., & Block, G.
- Venue
- Epidemiology
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 455-463
- ISSN
- 1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980568365
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of a Brief Telephone Questionnaire to Estimate Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Diverse Study Populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00001648-199309000-00012
- The paper
- Serdula, M., Coates, R., Byes, T., Mokdad, A., Jewell, S., Chavez, N., Mares-Perlman, J., Newcomb, P., Ritenbaugh, C., Treiber, F., & Block, G. (1993). Evaluation of a Brief Telephone Questionnaire to Estimate Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Diverse Study Populations. Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199309000-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.