Cited by 823Nutritional Studies and DietStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyNutrition and Health Studies

A REVIEW OF VALIDATIONS OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODS

BLOCK, GLADYS·1982·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

GLADYS BLOCK; A REVIEW OF VALIDATIONS OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODS, American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 115, Issue 4, 1 April 1982, Pages 492–505, https:/

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113331

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BLOCK, G.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
BLOCK, GLADYS
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1982-04
Volume
115
Issue
4
Pages
492-505
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2275310832
Cited by
823
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 19
FWCI
30.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
dietary assessment, validation, food frequency questionnaire, 24-hour dietary recall, methodological validity
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Diet Surveys, Epidemiologic Methods, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Nutrition Surveys, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review