The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Basic Epidemiology of Fractures of the Upper and Lower Limb among Americans over 65 Years of Age
Abstract
Current knowledge regarding the basic epidemiology of fractures is largely limited to a few fracture sites, notably those of the hip and distal forearm. To clarify the patterns of incidence of limb fractures in the elderly, we used data from a 5% sample of the U.S. Medicare population over age 65 years during the years 1986-1990. We identified incident fractures of the proximal humerus, other parts of the humerus, proximal radius/ ulna, shaft of the radius/ulna, distal radius/ulna, pelvis, hip, other parts of the femur, patella, ankle, and other parts of the tibia/fibula from diagnoses and procedures coded on claims for inpatient services, outpatient facility use, and physician services. We used Poisson regression to investigate the relation between demographic factors and fracture risk at these sites. Fractures at the hip were the most common, accounting for 38% of the fractures identified. The proximal humerus, distal radius/ulna, and ankle also were common fracture sites. A pattern of rapidly rising rates with age was seen for fractures of the pelvis, hip, and other parts of the femur among women. Fractures distal to the elbow or knee, however, had, at most, modest increases in incidence with age over 65 years. For each of the fractures studied, women had higher rates than men of the same race, and whites generally had higher rates than blacks of the same gender. Gender-related differences in risk were larger among whites than among blacks, and racial differences in risk were more marked among women than among men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shane, E., Burr, D., Abrahamsen, B., Adler, R. A., Brown, T. D., Cheung, A. M., Cosman, F., Curtis, J. R., Dell, R., Dempster, D. W., et al. (2014) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.1998 · Cited by 2,147
Shane, E., Burr, D., Ebeling, P. R., Abrahamsen, B., Adler, R. A., Brown, T. D., Cheung, A. M., Cosman, F., Curtis, J. R., Dell, R., et al. (2010) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.253 · Cited by 1,116
Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA
Dawson-Hughes, B., Tosteson, A. N. A., Melton, L. J., Baim, S., Favus, M. J., Khosla, S., & Lindsay, R. L. (2008) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0559-5 · Cited by 427
Metadata
- Authors
- Baron, J. A., Karagas, M., Barrett, J., Kniffin, W., Malenka, D., Mayor, M., & Keller, R. B.
- Venue
- Epidemiology
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 612-618
- ISSN
- 1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094819865
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Basic Epidemiology of Fractures of the Upper and Lower Limb among Americans over 65 Years of Age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00001648-199611000-00008
- The paper
- Baron, J. A., Karagas, M., Barrett, J., Kniffin, W., Malenka, D., Mayor, M., & Keller, R. B. (1996). Basic Epidemiology of Fractures of the Upper and Lower Limb among Americans over 65 Years of Age. Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199611000-00008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.