The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mortality in Current and Former Users of Clozapine
Abstract
Dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin, or TCDD) is a powerful carcinogen in experimental animals, whereas the evidence in humans is limited. We examined cancer mortality from 1976 to 1991 among residents of Seveso, Italy, which was highly contaminated after an industrial accident. The area was divided into zones with decreasing exposure to dioxin (A = highest, B = lower, R = lowest). The population of a surrounding noncontaminated area was used as a reference group. Zone A was small (11,516 person-years); in that zone, we saw a moderate increase in mortality from digestive cancer among women [relative risk (RR) = 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.5–3.5]. In zone B, we also saw excesses at digestive sites (83,610 person-years), 10 years after the accident. Women had an increased mortality from stomach cancer (RR = 2.4; 95% CI = 0.8–5.7), and men had increased mortality from rectal cancer (RR = 6.2; 95% CI = 1.7–15.9). Hematologic neoplasms were increased. The highest risks were seen in zone B for leukemia in men (RR = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.3–6.4), multiple myeloma in women (RR = 6.6; 95% CI = 1.8–16.8), and Hodgkin's disease in both genders (RR = 3.3; 95% CI = 0.4–11.9 in men; and RR = 6.5; 95% CI = 0.7–23.5 in women). Soft tissue sarcoma was elevated only among zone R males (256,408 person-years; RR = 2.1; 95% CI = 0.6–5.4). We found no increase for all-cancer mortality or major specific sites (for example, respiratory among males, breast among females). The specific excesses that we observed were not explained by bias or confounding, and their association with dioxin exposure is plausible. The follow-up is continuing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Causes of death in schizophrenia and manic-depression
Tsuang, M. T., Woolson, R. F., & Fleming, J. A. (1980) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.136.3.239 · Cited by 135
Cited by
Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs
Ray, W. A. (2003) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwg231 · Cited by 1,646
Meltzer, H. Y. (2003) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.1.82 · Cited by 1,393
Neurobiology of suicidal behaviour
Mann, J. J. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1220 · Cited by 1,260
The 2009 Schizophrenia PORT Psychopharmacological Treatment Recommendations and Summary Statements
Buchanan, R. W., Kreyenbuhl, J., Kelly, D. L., Noel, J. M., Boggs, D. L., Fischer, B. A., Himelhoch, S., Fang, B., Peterson, E., Aquino, P. R., et al. (2010) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp116 · Cited by 907
Mortality of patients with mood disorders: follow-up over 34–38 years
Angst, F., Stassen, H. H., Clayton, P. J., & Angst, J. (2002) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00377-9 · Cited by 881
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker, A. M., Lanza, L. L., Arellano, F., & Rothman, K. J.
- Venue
- Epidemiology
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 671
- ISSN
- 1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092065606
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality in Current and Former Users of Clozapine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00001648-199710000-00010
- The paper
- Walker, A. M., Lanza, L. L., Arellano, F., & Rothman, K. J. (1997). Mortality in Current and Former Users of Clozapine. Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199710000-00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.