The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Do We Still Need a Cohort Study of Women with HIV Infection?
Abstract
The Women's Interagency HIV Study comprises the largest U.S. cohort to date of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive women (N = 2,058) with a comparison cohort of seronegative women (N = 568). The methodology, training, and quality assurance activities employed are described. The study population, enrolled between October 1994 and November 1995 through six clinical consortia throughout the United States (totaling 23 sites) represents a typically hard-to-reach study population. More than half of the women in each cohort were living below the federally defined levels of poverty. The women ranged in age from 16 to 73 years; approximately one-quarter self-identified as Latina or Hispanic, over one-half as African-American not of Hispanic origin, and less than 20% as white, non-Hispanic origin. Self-reporting of HIV exposure risk included injection drug use by 34% of the seropositive women and 28% of the seronegative women, heterosexual contact (42% vs 26%), transfusion risk (4% vs 3%) and no identified risk (20% vs 43%). Demographic and HIV exposure risk characteristics of the seropositive cohort were comparable with characteristics of nationally reported AIDS cases in U.S. women. This well characterized cohort of HIV-seropositive and high-risk seronegative women represents a rich opportunity for future studies of HIV disease progression and pathogenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Generalizing Evidence From Randomized Clinical Trials to Target Populations: The ACTG 320 Trial
Cole, S. R., & Stuart, E. A. (2010) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwq084 · Cited by 486
Depressive Symptoms and AIDS-Related Mortality Among a Multisite Cohort of HIV-Positive Women
Cook, J. A., Grey, D., Burke, J., Cohen, M. H., Gurtman, A. C., Richardson, J. L., Wilson, T. E., Young, M. A., & Hessol, N. A. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.7.1133 · Cited by 396
Cohort Profile: The Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS)
Adimora, A. A., Ramirez, C., Benning, L., Greenblatt, R. M., Kempf, M.-C., Tien, P. C., Kassaye, S. G., Anastos, K., Cohen, M., Minkoff, H., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyy021 · Cited by 298
Dale, S., Cohen, M., Weber, K., Cruise, R., Kelso, G., & Brody, L. (2014) · AIDS Patient Care and STDs · doi:10.1089/apc.2013.0329 · Cited by 135
Cook, J. A., Burke-Miller, J. K., Steigman, P. J., Schwartz, R. M., Hessol, N. A., Milam, J., Merenstein, D. J., Anastos, K., Golub, E. T., & Cohen, M. H. (2018) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-018-2051-3 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- &NA;
- Venue
- Epidemiology
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 111-112
- ISSN
- 1044-3983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163142190
- Cited by
- 728
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do We Still Need a Cohort Study of Women with HIV Infection? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00001648-199803000-00001
- The paper
- &NA;. (1998). Do We Still Need a Cohort Study of Women with HIV Infection? Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199803000-00001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.