Cited by 36Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Regulation of α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in M10 cells following treatment with nicotinic agents

Zhang, Xiao, Gong, Ze-Hui, Hellström-Lindahl, Ewa, Nordberg, Agneta·1995·Neuroreport

Abstract

The effects of chronic treatment (3 days) with the nicotinic agonists, nicotine and cytisine as well as the antagonists, d-tubocurarine, hexamethonium and dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DH beta E) on alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) were investigated in a permanently transfected cell line, M10. The number of alpha 4 beta 2 nAChRs expressed in the cell line was assayed by (-)-[3H]nicotine binding. The two enantiomers of nicotine both significantly increased the number of nAChRs in a concentration dependent manner. No changes in the levels of mRNA for either alpha 4 or beta 2 subunits were found following chronic (-)-nicotine treatment. The effect of (-)-nicotine treatment on the number of nAChRs was partially blocked by the antagonists d-tubocurarine and hexamethonium, but not by dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DH beta E). Chronic exposure of the cells to each of the antagonists did not influence the number of nAChRs. Treatment with the agonist cytisine resulted in a bell-shaped dose-dependent effect on the number of alpha 4 beta 2 nAChRs. In the presence of cytisine (microM) the effect induced by chronic(-)-nicotine treatment on the number of the nAChRs was attenuated. These results indicate that nicotinic agents can induce different regulatory effects in M10 cells due to their individual pharmacological properties as agonist and/or antagonist.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-199501000-00022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Greater β2*-nAChR availability is not associated with changes in β2*-nAChR mRNA, protein synthesis, rate of receptor internalization, postendocytic trafficking, or lysosomal degradation.

    “Greater ␤ 2 *- nAChR availability is not associated with changes in ␤ 2 *-nAChR mRNA (Marks et al., 1992;Peng et al., 1994;Zhang et al., 1994) protein synthesis (Buisson and Bertrand, 2001), rate of receptor internalization, postendocytic trafficking, or lysosomal degradation (Darsow et al., 2005)”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Gong, Z.-H., Hellström-Lindahl, E., & Nordberg, A.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
1995-01
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
313-317
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985242427
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 2
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, receptor regulation, nicotine, cytisine, tubocurarine, hexamethonium, dihydro-beta-erythroidine, receptor up-regulation
MeSH terms
Quinolizidine Alkaloids, Alkaloids, Animals, Azocines, Cell Line, Dihydro-beta-Erythroidine, Models, Biological, Nicotine, Quinolizines, Receptors, Nicotinic, Tubocurarine, Hexamethonium, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review