Cited by 76Neuroscience and Music PerceptionHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNeural dynamics and brain function

Dual cerebral processing of elementary auditory input in children

Karhu, Jari, Herrgård, Eila, Pääkkönen, Ari, Luoma, Laila, Airaksinen, Eila, Partanen, Juhani·1997·NeuroReport

Abstract

We compared event-related responses (ERPs) to non-attended frequent and intermittent auditory input in school-aged children and in young adults. In adults, both inputs elicited prominent auditory N100 responses at vertex. In children, intermittent stimulation evoked vertex responses with similar latency and refractoriness, whereas frequently delivered identical tones evoked responses on average at 240 ms. Sensitization of a separate neuronal population at 260-300 ms was obvious during intermittent stimulation in children. The dual behaviour, simultaneous 'habituation' of one neuronal population response and sensitization of another, may reflect the process of redirecting the attention and setting up a neuronal model. Furthermore, results suggest that a simplistic interpretation of developmental ERPs in which shortening of latencies represents maturation is insufficient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-199704140-00002

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karhu, J., Herrgård, E., Pääkkönen, A., Luoma, L., Airaksinen, E., & Partanen, J.
Affiliations
Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
Venue
NeuroReport
Published
1997-04
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
1327-1330
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113354979
Cited by
76
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
event-related potentials, auditory attention, habituation, sensory sensitization, developmental maturation, children, young adults, auditory cortex
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Aging, Child, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Neurons, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review