Cited by 63Visual perception and processing mechanismsSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionFace Recognition and Perception

Hemifield visual motion stimulation: An example of interhemispheric crosstalk

Brandt, Thomas, Stephan, Thomas, Bense, Sandra, Yousry, Tarek A., Dieterich, Marianne·2000·NeuroReport

Abstract

Coherent motion stimulation of the right or left visual hemifield was performed in nine healthy volunteers in order to investigate interhemispheric visuo-visual interaction by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging. The vertical edge of the motion pattern field was located 8 degrees distant from the fixation point to avoid stimulating the vertical meridian, which is represented retinotopically in both hemispheres. Bilateral activation was significant in the middle occipital gyrus (motion-sensitive middle temporal/middle superior temporal areas; BA 19/37). A negative signal change was found in the primary visual cortex including the lingual and fusiform gyri (BA 18/17) and the occipital white matter containing the optic radiation contralateral to the stimulated hemisphere. These data are most compatible with an interhemispheric transfer of visual motion information, most likely through the corpus callosum. Transcallosal transfer of visual motion information, evident as increases (BA 19/37) and decreases (BA 18/17) of the fMRI signals, may be functionally significant for the processing of motion perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-200008210-00039

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brandt, T., Stephan, T., Bense, S., Yousry, T. A., & Dieterich, M.
Affiliations
LMU Klinikum (DE)
Venue
NeuroReport
Published
2000-08
Volume
11
Issue
12
Pages
2803-2809
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997287495
Cited by
63
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
visual motion perception, interhemispheric transfer, corpus callosum, hemifield stimulation, middle temporal area, primary visual cortex, occipital white matter, optic radiation, interhemispheric interaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motion Perception, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review