The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortisol levels and time-discounting of monetary gain in humans
Abstract
This study was conducted to examine the relationship between cortisol levels and preference to a small immediate over a larger delayed monetary reward. The degree of preference to a small immediate reward (a time-discounting rate) was investigated with an economic decision-making task in which each subject made an inter-temporal choice between (a) 10,000 yen available immediately and (b) an equal or larger amount of money after a delay of one year. The time-discounting rate was defined as [the required minimal amount of the delayed monetary gain for (b) to be preferred]-10,000/10, 000. Low cortisol levels were shown to associate with a large time-discounting rate, indicating that subjects with low cortisol levels may be impulsive in inter-temporal choice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While these findings point to more risky decision-making under stress, which may translate to higher delay discounting, high basal cortisol levels have actually been associated with less risky behavior on the Iowa Gambling Task (van Honk et al., 2003), as well as with lower delay discounting rates (Takahashi, 2004).”
From Individual Differences in Delay Discounting Under Acute Stress: The Role of Trait Perceived Stress (2012) · cites this paper as Takahashi, 2004
Citations
Cites
Petry, N. M. (2001) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130000638 · Cited by 761
Contrasting Roles of Basolateral Amygdala and Orbitofrontal Cortex in Impulsive Choice
Winstanley, C. A., Theobald, D. E. H., Cardinal, R. N., & Robbins, T. W. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5606-03.2004 · Cited by 675
Low cortisol levels and the balance between punishment sensitivity and reward dependency
Honk, J. V., Schutter, D. J. L. G., Hermans, E. J., & Putman, P. (2003) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200310270-00023 · Cited by 127
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Camerer, 2003, Science, 300, 1673, 10.1126/science.1086215 · DOI
- Bechara, 2003, Ann NY Acad Sci, 985, 356, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07094.x · DOI
- Giordano, 2002, Psychopharmacology, 163, 174, 10.1007/s00213-002-1159-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Montague, 2002, Neuron, 36, 265, 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00974-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Kheramin, 2002, Psychopharmacology (Berl), 165, 9, 10.1007/s00213-002-1228-6 · DOI
- Lupien, 1997, Brain Res Rev, 24, 1, 10.1016/S0165-0173(97)00004-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Takahashi, 2002, J Neurochem, 83, 1441, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01251.x · DOI
- Shibuya, 2003, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1619, 301, 10.1016/S0304-4165(02)00489-0 · DOI
- Takahashi, 2004, Neurosci Lett, 363, 125, 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.03.062 · DOI
- Erickson, 2003, Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 27, 233, 10.1016/S0149-7634(03)00033-2 · DOI
- Saal, 2003, Neuron, 37, 577, 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00021-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Shimada, 1995, Horm Res, 44, 213, 10.1159/000184628 · DOI
- Frederick, 2002, J Econ Lit, 40, 351, 10.1257/002205102320161311 · DOI
- Kauer, 2004, Annu Rev Physiol, 66, 447, 10.1146/annurev.physiol.66.032102.112534 · DOI
- Mobini, 2000, Psychopharmacology (Berl), 149, 313, 10.1007/s002130000385 · DOI
- Winstanley, 2003, Psychopharmacology (Berl), 170, 320, 10.1007/s00213-003-1546-3 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lovallo, W. R. (2013) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.10.006 · Cited by 315
Reinforcement learning in depression: a review of computational research
Chen, C., Takahashi, T., Nakagawa, S., Inoue, T., & Kusumi, I. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.005 · Cited by 233
Neural mechanism of intertemporal choice: From discounting future gains to future losses
Xu, L., Liang, Z.-Y., Wang, K., Li, S., & Jiang, T. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.061 · Cited by 161
Individual Differences in Delay Discounting Under Acute Stress: The Role of Trait Perceived Stress
Lempert, K. M., Porcelli, A. J., Delgado, M. R., & Tricomi, E. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00251 · Cited by 112
The stress–response-dampening effects of placebo
Balodis, I. M., Wynne-Edwards, K. E., & Olmstead, M. C. (2011) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.01.004 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Takahashi, T.
- Venue
- NeuroReport
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2145-2147
- ISSN
- 0959-4965
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
