The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exploring Nursing Home Staffʼs Perceptions of Communication and Leadership to Facilitate Quality Improvement
Abstract
Leadership and clinical staff were surveyed to explore communication and leadership in nursing homes. Registered nurses and other professionals perceived communication as better than their nursing colleagues did. Overall, results suggest all factors of communication could improve. In terms of leadership, licensed practical nurses perceived less clarity of expectations, encouragement of initiative, and support than other groups. The study provides insight into what is organizationally necessary to improve quality of care in nursing homes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Shortell, 1991, Med Care, 29, 709, 10.1097/00005650-199108000-00004 · DOI
- Shortell, 1994, Med Care, 32, 508, 10.1097/00005650-199405000-00009 · DOI
- Rantz, 1999, J Nurs Care Q, 14, 16, 10.1097/00001786-199910000-00004 · DOI
- Cadogan, 1999, J Am Geriatr Soc, 47, 71, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01903.x · DOI
- Riggs, 2001, Nurs Adm Q, 25, 43, 10.1097/00006216-200101000-00009 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cimarolli, V. R., Bryant, N. S., Falzarano, F., & Stone, R. (2022) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/07334648211040509 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott-Cawiezell, J., Schenkman, M., Moore, L., Vojir, C., Connolly, R. P., Pratt, M., & Palmer, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Health (US)
- ORCID
- Moore, Laurie
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Care Quality
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 242-252
- ISSN
- 1057-3631 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021189189
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Nursing Care Quality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Iowa Research Online (University of Iowa) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- nursing homes, leadership, communication, quality improvement, registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, employee perceptions, organizational support, quality of care
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Leadership, Male, Motivation, Nurse Administrators, Nursing Assistants, Nursing Homes, Nursing Staff, Nursing, Supervisory, Social Support, United States, Organizational Culture, Nursing Methodology Research, Organizational Policy, Total Quality Management, Nurse's Role, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
