Cited by 19Medical Education and AdmissionsHigher Education Research StudiesCareer Development and Diversity

A state universityʼs model program to increase the number of its disadvantaged students who matriculate into health professions schools

Lewis, C L·1996·Academic Medicine

Abstract

Health professions schools often provide support for minority and disadvantaged students in high school or in a single college summer program. However, long-term support for students during their undergraduate years is also crucial. Since 1990, San Diego State University (SDSU), a large urban public university, has implemented the Health Careers Opportunity Program (HCOP) to increase the number of the university's disadvantaged students (most of whom are from minority groups) who matriculate into medical, dental, veterinary, and physician assistant schools. The program's 11 components, each dedicated to some form of educational intervention and support, emphasize developing students' collaborative learning skills, fostering their pride in accomplishment, and helping them achieve positive self-images and self-confidence; these goals are linked with building students' analytical and problem-solving skills. Weekly journals kept by students' mentors serve as an "early warning system" for "bad" feelings, attitudes, and behaviors that reflect students' personal problems and correlate with lower grades, and help the program staff work intensively with students immediately, before problems become severe. The SDSU's HCOP increased the number of disadvantaged (mostly minority) students staying in the prehealth career path (not counting those in the schools of nursing and public health) from 70 in 1989 to 360 in 1995. In 1992 through 1994, the students who had completed the HCOP's Summer Academic Program (to help them bridge into a science curriculum) had pass rates for entry-level math, writing competency, and math placement that were consistently higher than the rates for other SDSU students. The overall grade-point average of HCOP students in the spring of 1995 (3.05) was significantly higher than the overall GPA of all minority students in prehealth training before the HCOP began (2.59 in 1988). The number of SDSU's minority students accepted by health professions schools (primarily medical schools) rose significantly from six in 1990 to 23 in 1995. It is clear that the labor-intensive interventions of the HCOP throughout students' years at SDSU until they matriculate into health professions schools are working.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001888-199610000-00010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lewis, C. L.
Affiliations
San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lewis, C L
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
1996-10
Volume
71
Issue
10
Pages
1050-7
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050521065
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
San Diego State University, disadvantaged students, minority students, mentoring, early warning systems, student retention, academic support, cooperative learning, self-confidence, medical school admissions
MeSH terms
California, Education, Premedical, Educational Status, Health Occupations, Humans, Minority Groups, Universities, Models, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review