A pilot course as a model for implementing a PBL curriculum
Abstract
Many medical schools are shifting to a problem-based learning (PBL) curriculum, some without any transition period, others using periods of parallel-track curricula. The authors report on and discuss a third strategy for implementing PBL: using a pilot course as a model to facilitate the transition. After the Université de Montréal Faculty of Medicine chose to switch PBL, one course in the third year of the traditional curriculum was changed to PBL format 11 months before the new curriculum was to start in September 1993. This was done to develop local expertise, to gain confidence, to test the feasibility of the method, to produce a showcase, to assess more accurately the resources required, and to provide a practice ground for the curriculum planners and managers and the faculty-development training team. The authors discuss the planning of the pilot course, the training of the faculty in various aspects of PBL (writing problems, tutoring methods, etc.), the course implementation, and the course evaluation. Overall, the pilot course was well received by both the faculty and the students and provided much beneficial information that assisted the university in its transition to a new PBL curriculum.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most tutor satisfaction publications were surveys or questionnaires.
“most of them surveys or questionnaires [85, 88, 92, 98, 108, 110, 119].”
From Effectiveness of problem-based learning methodology in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [88]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trullàs, J. C., Blay, C., Sarri, E., & Pujol, R. (2022) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03154-8 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vincelette, J., Lalande, R., Delorme, P., Goudreau, J., Lalonde, V, & Jean, P.
- Affiliations
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 698-701
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033402929
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biomedical and Engineering Education
- Keywords
- problem-based learning, pilot course, curriculum transition, medical education, faculty development, curriculum development, course evaluation
- MeSH terms
- Faculty, Medical, Pilot Projects, Quebec, Schools, Medical, Program Development, Models, Educational, Problem-Based Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review