Participation in a premedical summer program for underrepresented-minority students as a predictor of academic performance in the first three years of medical school: two studies
Abstract
Purpose To determine whether the performances of underrepresented minority students in the Medical Education and Development Program (MEDP) at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) School of Medicine (a structured, nine-week summer premedical program that simulates the medical school's first year curriculum) predicted their academic performances in the first three years of medical school. Method These two studies looked separately at the predictive value of students' rankings (top quarter or top half) within their MEDP cohorts. The first study involved 165 students who had participated in the MEDP from 1981 to 1990 and who then matriculated at UNC-CH. Using backward elimination logistic regression models, the author determined whether those rankings and other, more traditional academic performance predictors predicted three types of academic difficulty during the first two years of medical school: (1) required participation in summer review; (2) deceleration; and (3) dismissal. The predictive validity of each regression model was assessed by calculating the sensitivity and the positive predictive value. The second study involved 135 students who had participated in the MEDP from 1981 to 1990 and who had finished their third-year clinical clerkships at UNC-CH. Forty-four of those students had taken the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Part II examination. Using Spearman correlations, the Student t test, and the chi-square test, the author determined t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Post-baccalaureate programs have been shown to improve academic success among underrepresented students.
“One avenue of academic intervention may be post-baccalaureate programs, which have been shown to improve academic success among underrepresented students [9,19,22].”
From Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
Premedical summer programs may predict medical school performance.
“This study found that academic ranking within the MEDP predicted medical school academic outcomes, suggesting that premedical summer programs may predict medical school performance [22].”
From Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
Academic ranking within the MEDP predicted medical school academic outcomes.
“This study found that academic ranking within the MEDP predicted medical school academic outcomes, suggesting that premedical summer programs may predict medical school performance [22].”
From Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review
Jaganathan, N., Guntaka, R., Goel, V., Odo, N., Sun, Z., & Arthur, M. E. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.109396
- Authors
- Strayhorn, G.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Strayhorn, G
- Venue
- Academic Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-47
- ISSN
- 1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085785357
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- underrepresented minority students, predictive validity, deceleration, student dismissal
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Clerkship, Education, Premedical, Educational Measurement, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Minority Groups, North Carolina, Schools, Medical, Students, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review