The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine how concurrent partnerships amplify the rate of HIV spread, using methods that can be supported by feasible data collection. METHODS: A fully stochastic simulation is used to represent a population of individuals, the sexual partnerships that they form and dissolve over time, and the spread of an infectious disease. Sequential monogamy is compared with various levels of concurrency, holding all other features of the infection process constant. Effective summary measures of concurrency are developed that can be estimated on the basis of simple local network data. RESULTS: Concurrent partnerships exponentially increase the number of infected individuals and the growth rate of the epidemic during its initial phase. For example, when one-half of the partnerships in a population are concurrent, the size of the epidemic after 5 years is 10 times as large as under sequential monogamy. The primary cause of this amplification is the growth in the number of people connected in the network at any point in time: the size of the largest "component'. Concurrency increases the size of this component, and the result is that the infectious agent is no longer trapped in a monogamous partnership after transmission occurs, but can spread immediately beyond this partnership to infect others. The summary measure of concurrency developed here does a good job in predicting the size of the amplification effect, and may therefore be a useful and practical tool for evaluation and intervention at the beginning of an epidemic. CONCLUSION: Concurrent partnerships may be as important as multiple partners or cofactor infections in amplifying the spread of HIV. The public health implications are that data must be collected properly to measure the levels of concurrency in a population, and that messages promoting one partner at a time are as important as messages promoting fewer partners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chains of affection: the structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks
Bearman, P. S., Moody, J., & Stovel, K. (2004) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/386272 · Cited by 817
Sexual behaviour in Britain: Partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours.
Johnson, A. M., Mercer, C. H., Erens, B., Copas, A. J., McManus, S., Wellings, K., Fenton, K. A., Korovessis, C., Macdowall, W., Nanchahal, K., et al. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06883-0 · Cited by 815
Activity driven modeling of time varying networks
Perra, N., Gonçalves, B., Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00469 · Cited by 709
Dunkle, K. L., Jewkes, R. K., Brown, H. C., Gray, G. E., McIntryre, J. A., & Harlow, S. D. (2004) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.003 · Cited by 566
Rectal gonorrhea and chlamydia reinfection is associated with increased risk of HIV seroconversion.
Bernstein, K. T., Marcus, J. L., Nieri, G., Philip, S. S., & Klausner, J. D. (2010) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/qai.0b013e3181c3ef29 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, M., & Kretzschmar, M.
- Venue
- AIDS
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 641-648
- ISSN
- 0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116870694
- Cited by
- 976
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00002030-199705000-00012
- The paper
- Morris, M., & Kretzschmar, M. (1997). Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-199705000-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.