The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efavirenz plasma levels can predict treatment failure and central nervous system side effects in HIV-1-infected patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Limited information exists on the clinical usefulness of drug level monitoring for efavirenz, a once-daily non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). The aim of this study was to determine whether efavirenz plasma concentration monitoring could predict treatment failure and central nervous system (CNS) tolerability. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 130 HIV-infected patients receiving efavirenz in combination with other antiretroviral agents for more than 3 months. Efavirenz plasma concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. An evaluation of CNS side-effects was performed and the viral load, CD4 cell count and other clinical and laboratory data were assessed. In 85 patients, these measures were repeated at 3 month intervals. RESULTS: Efavirenz plasma levels (n = 226) were measured at an average of 14 h after drug intake. Drug concentrations ranged from 125 to 15230 microg/l (median 2188). Large inter-patient (CV 118%) and limited intra-patient (CV 30%) variabilities were observed in efavirenz levels. Virological failure was observed in 50% of patients with low efavirenz levels (< 1000 microg/l) versus 22 and 18% in patients with 1000-4000 microg/l or more than 4000 microg/l, respectively. CNS toxicity was approximately three times more frequent in patients with high efavirenz levels (> 4000 microg/l) compared with patients with 1000-4000 microg/l. CONCLUSION: Treatment failure and CNS side-effects are associated with low and high efavirenz plasma levels, respectively. The important inter-individual variability in efavirenz levels strongly argues for dose adjustment on the basis of therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ward, B. A., Gorski, J. C., Jones, D. R., Hall, S. D., Flockhart, D. A., & Desta, Z. (2003) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.103.049601 · Cited by 593
Pharmacogenetics, Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Clinical Practice
Gardiner, S. J., & Begg, E. J. (2006) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.58.3.6 · Cited by 406
Scott, S. A., Sangkuhl, K., Shuldiner, A. R., Hulot, J.-S., Thorn, C. F., Altman, R. B., & Klein, T. E. (2012) · Pharmacogenetics and Genomics · doi:10.1097/fpc.0b013e32834d4962 · Cited by 261
Lee, L. S., Andrade, A. S. A., & Flexner, C. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/507894 · Cited by 102
Efavirenz: what is known about the cellular mechanisms responsible for its adverse effects
Apostolova, N., Blas-Garcia, A., Galindo, M. J., & Esplugues, J. V. (2017) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.07.016 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Marzolini, C., Telenti, A., Decosterd, L. A., Greub, G., Biollaz, J., & Buclin, T.
- Venue
- AIDS
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-75
- ISSN
- 0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106737113
- Cited by
- 840
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efavirenz plasma levels can predict treatment failure and central nervous system side effects in HIV-1-infected patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00002030-200101050-00011
- The paper
- Marzolini, C., Telenti, A., Decosterd, L. A., Greub, G., Biollaz, J., & Buclin, T. (2001). Efavirenz plasma levels can predict treatment failure and central nervous system side effects in HIV-1-infected patients. AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200101050-00011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.