The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sexual behavior of HIV discordant couples after HIV counseling and testing
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sexual behavior following voluntary HIV counseling and testing (VCT) is described in 963 cohabiting heterosexual couples with one HIV positive and one HIV negative partner ('discordant couples'). Biological markers were used to assess the validity of self-report. METHODS: Couples were recruited from a same-day VCT center in Lusaka, Zambia. Sexual exposures with and without condoms were recorded at 3-monthly intervals. Sperm detected on vaginal smears, pregnancy, and sexually transmitted diseases (STD) including HIV, gonorrhea, syphilis, and Trichomonas vaginalis were assessed. RESULTS: Less than 3% of couples reported current condom use prior to VCT. In the year after VCT, > 80% of reported acts of intercourse in discordant couples included condom use. Reporting 100% condom use was associated with 39-70% reductions in biological markers; however most intervals with reported unprotected sex were negative for all biological markers. Under-reporting was common: 50% of sperm and 32% of pregnancies and HIV transmissions were detected when couples had reported always using condoms. Positive laboratory tests for STD and reported extramarital sex were relatively infrequent. DNA sequencing confirmed that 87% of new HIV infections were acquired from the spouse. CONCLUSIONS: Joint VCT prompted sustained but imperfect condom use in HIV discordant couples. Biological markers were insensitive but provided evidence for a significant under-reporting of unprotected sex. Strategies that encourage truthful reporting of sexual behavior and sensitive biological markers of exposure are urgently needed. The impact of prevention programs should be assessed with both behavioral and biological measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Behavioural strategies to reduce HIV transmission: how to make them work better
Coates, T. J., Richter, L., & Caceres, C. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60886-7 · Cited by 760
Antenatal Couple Counseling Increases Uptake of Interventions to Prevent HIV-1 Transmission
Farquhar, C., Kiarie, J. N., Richardson, B. A., Kabura, M. N., John, F. N., Nduati, R. W., Mbori-Ngacha, D. A., & John-Stewart, G. C. (2004) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/00126334-200412150-00016 · Cited by 429
Burton, J., Darbes, L. A., & Operario, D. (2010) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-008-9471-4 · Cited by 303
Msuya, S. E., Mbizvo, E. M., Hussain, A., Uriyo, J., Sam, N. E., & Stray-Pedersen, B. (2008) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540120701687059 · Cited by 255
Syphilis Treatment Response Among HIV-Discordant Couples in Zambia and Rwanda
Dionne-Odom, J., Karita, E., Kilembe, W., Henderson, F., Vwalika, B., Bayingana, R., Li, Z., Mulenga, J., Chomba, E., del Rio, C., et al. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cit146 · Cited by 52
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, S., Meinzen-Derr, J., Kautzman, M., Zulu, I., Trask, S., Fideli, U., Musonda, R., Kasolo, F., Gao, F., & Haworth, A.
- Venue
- AIDS
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 733-740
- ISSN
- 0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021840422
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual behavior of HIV discordant couples after HIV counseling and testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00002030-200303280-00012
- The paper
- Allen, S., Meinzen-Derr, J., Kautzman, M., Zulu, I., Trask, S., Fideli, U., Musonda, R., Kasolo, F., Gao, F., & Haworth, A. (2003). Sexual behavior of HIV discordant couples after HIV counseling and testing. AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200303280-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.