Cited by 70

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinicopathologic Correlates in Alzheimer Disease: Assessment of Clinical and Pathologic Diagnostic Criteria

Kazee, A. M., Eskin, T. A., Lapham, L. W., Gabriel, K. R., McDaniel, K. D., Hamill, R. W.·1993·Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders

Abstract

The neuropathologic findings from a group of 123 patients who have come to autopsy from the Rochester Alzheimer Disease Project (RADP) are presented. Among these 123 cases, there were 94 demented subjects who met the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) clinical criteria for the diagnosis of "probable Alzheimer disease," and 29 normal elderly controls. Autopsy confirmation of Alzheimer disease (AD) was based on the age-graded National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus conference pathologic criteria. Using the NINCDS-ADRDA clinical criteria and the NIH pathologic criteria, the diagnostic accuracy was 88%, the sensitivity was 98%, and the specificity was 69%. Additional strict clinical and pathologic criteria developed by the RADP were applied in the final review of these cases to exclude all confounding causes of dementia, including cerebral infarcts. After applying these additional criteria, a subset of 62 cases of "pure" AD and "pure" control subjects was identified for a more detailed examination of neuritic plaques (NP) and neurons containing neurofibrillary tangles (NFT). The NP and NFT were counted in three subfields of hippocampus and two areas of association neocortex. The density of diffuse plaques (plaques lacking dystrophic neurites) was estimated on a semiquantitative basis. Results show that the AD patients and control groups could be distinguished from each…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002093-199307030-00004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
Kazee, A. M., Eskin, T. A., Lapham, L. W., Gabriel, K. R., McDaniel, K. D., & Hamill, R. W.
Venue
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
Published
1993
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
152-164
ISSN
0893-0341
Cited by
70
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinicopathologic Correlates in Alzheimer Disease: Assessment of Clinical and Pathologic Diagnostic Criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00002093-199307030-00004
The paper
Kazee, A. M., Eskin, T. A., Lapham, L. W., Gabriel, K. R., McDaniel, K. D., & Hamill, R. W. (1993). Clinicopathologic Correlates in Alzheimer Disease: Assessment of Clinical and Pathologic Diagnostic Criteria. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002093-199307030-00004