Cited by 62Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsCerebrovascular and genetic disorders

Imaging of Static Brain Lesions in Vascular Dementia: Implications for Clinical Trials

Open access

Abstract

Vascular dementia (VaD) relates to different vascular mechanisms and changes in the brain and has different causes and clinical manifestations, reflecting complex interactions between vascular etiologies, changes in the brain, host factors, and cognition. Critical elements to the concept and diagnosis of VaD are defining the vascular causes, the vascular etiologies, and changes in the brain. Verifying the relation between brain lesions and cognition (i.e., the extent to which brain changes cause, compound, or coexist with cognitive impairment) and establishing the types, extent, side, site, and tempo of brain lesions that relate to incident cognitive impairment are major diagnostic challenges. Previous work on interactions between brain lesion and cognition in to cerebrovascular disease (CVD) have shown variation in the definitions and measures of cognitive impairment, in the techniques and methods used to reveal different brain changes, and in the selection of patient populations. Furthermore, small sample sizes and the absence of multivariate statistics have been design limitations. Accordingly, the different sets of criteria used and methods applied identify different numbers and clusters of subjects and different distribution of brain changes. Furthermore, this heterogeneity is reflected in variation in natural history such as the rate of progression of decline in different cognitive domains over time. All these factors have hampered optimal designs of clinical drug trial…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002093-199912003-00013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erkinjuntti, T., Bowler, J. V., DeCarli, C. S., Fazekas, F., Inzitari, D., O??Brien, J. T., Pantoni, L., Rockwood, K., Scheltens, P., Wahlund, L.-O., & Desmond, D. W.
Affiliations
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • University of Graz (AT)
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Bowler, John V.
  • Scheltens, Philip
Venue
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
Published
1999-12
Volume
13
Issue
Supplement 3
Pages
S81-S90
ISSN
0893-0341 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088363431
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS017950)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Keywords
vascular dementia, brain lesions, white matter lesions, medial temporal lobe atrophy, cerebrovascular disease, cognitive impairment, clinical trial design, vascular burden, periventricular white matter lesions, dementia diagnosis, patient selection criteria
MeSH terms
Brain, Cerebral Infarction, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Dementia, Vascular, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review