Cited by 87Disability Education and EmploymentMedical Practices and RehabilitationRetirement, Disability, and Employment

Employment and work disability in rheumatoid arthritis

Backman, Catherine L.·2004·Current Opinion in Rheumatology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The cost of work disability due to rheumatoid arthritis is substantial to both individuals and society. Approximately one third of people with rheumatoid arthritis will leave employment prematurely. Several studies over the past two decades have identified risk factors for work disability, and recent literature suggests increasing interest in ways to assess work limitations and offer interventions to prevent work loss. RECENT FINDINGS: Work disability results from a complex interaction of characteristics of individuals, the nature of their work, and their environment, including the physical workplace, policies related to work accommodation, and interpersonal relationships. Practitioners need tools to help identify patients experiencing limitations in the workplace and at risk for permanent work disability. Two new tools show promise in this area. Although there is general agreement that vocational assessment and intervention should occur early in the course of rheumatoid arthritis, evidence for vocational rehabilitation is sadly lacking. A recent systematic review identified only six studies, all uncontrolled, but suggestive of beneficial effects. SUMMARY: Assessment of possible work limitations and potential for vocational rehabilitation should be considered in the evaluation of employed patients and those wishing to work. Further development and evaluation of work retention and return-to-work programs for people with rheumatoid arthritis is required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002281-200403000-00014

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Backman, C. L.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Backman, Catherine L.
Venue
Current Opinion in Rheumatology
Published
2004-03
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
148-152
ISSN
1040-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010220653
Cited by
87
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, work disability, employment, risk factors, vocational rehabilitation, return to work, workplace accommodations, work environment
MeSH terms
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Employment, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Risk Factors, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review