The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Tension-Stress Effect on the Genesis and Growth of Tissues: Part II. The Influence of the Rate and Frequency of Distraction
Abstract
To assess the influence of both the rate and the frequency of distraction on osteogenesis during limb elongation, a canine tibia was used with various combinations of distraction rates (0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, or 2.0 mm per day) and distraction frequencies (one step per day, four steps per day, 60 steps per day). The distractions were performed after both open osteotomy and closed osteoclasis. Histomorphic and biochemical studies were conducted on the elongated osseous tissue, fascia, skeletal muscle, smooth muscle, blood vessels, nerves, and skin. It was determined that distraction at a rate of 0.5 mm per day often led to premature consolidation of the lengthening bone, while a distraction rate of 2.0 mm per day often resulted in undesirable changes within elongating tissues. A distraction rate of 1.0 mm per day led to the best results. It was also observed that the greater the distraction frequency, the better the outcome. With optimum preservation of periosseous tissues, bone marrow, and blood supply at the time of osteotomy, stability of external fixation, and 1.0 mm per day of distraction in four steps, osteogenesis within the distraction gap of an elongating bone takes place by the formation of a physislike structure, in which new bone forms in parallel columns extending in both directions from a central growth zone. The growth plate that forms under the influence of tension-stress has features of both physeal and intramembranous ossification, yet is neither; instead, the distraction regenerated bone is unique, providing numerous applications in clinical trau-matology, orthopedics, and other medical disciplines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomaterial developments for bone tissue engineering
Burg, K. J. L., Porter, S., & Kellam, J. F. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00102-2 · Cited by 1,643
Enhancement of fracture-healing.
Einhorn, T. A. (1995) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199506000-00016 · Cited by 772
Marcacci, M., Kon, E., Moukhachev, V., Lavroukov, A., Kutepov, S., Quarto, R., Mastrogiacomo, M., & Cancedda, R. (2007) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2006.0271 · Cited by 589
Pobloth, A.-M., Checa, S., Razi, H., Petersen, A., Weaver, J. C., Schmidt-Bleek, K., Windolf, M., Tatai, A. Á., Roth, C. P., Schaser, K.-D., et al. (2018) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aam8828 · Cited by 312
Glatt, V., Evans, C. H., & Tetsworth, K. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00678 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- ILIZAROV, G. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 1989-02
- Volume
- 239
- Pages
- 263-285
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4292425573
- Cited by
- 1,263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Tension-Stress Effect on the Genesis and Growth of Tissues: Part II. The Influence of the Rate and Frequency of Distraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003086-198902000-00029
- The paper
- ILIZAROV, G. A. (1989). The Tension-Stress Effect on the Genesis and Growth of Tissues: Part II. The Influence of the Rate and Frequency of Distraction. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198902000-00029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.