Cited by 589Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsBone fractures and treatmentsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Stem Cells Associated with Macroporous Bioceramics for Long Bone Repair: 6- to 7-Year Outcome of a Pilot Clinical Study

Marcacci, Maurilio, Kon, Elizaveta, Moukhachev, Vladimir, Lavroukov, Andrei, Kutepov, Sergej, Quarto, Rodolfo, Mastrogiacomo, Maddalena, Cancedda, Ranieri·2007·Tissue Engineering

Abstract

Extensive bone loss is still a major problem in orthopedics. A number of different therapeutic approaches have been developed and proposed, but so far none have proven to be fully satisfactory. We used a new tissue engineering approach to treat four patients with large bone diaphysis defects and poor therapeutic alternatives. To obtain implantable three-dimensional (3D) living constructs, cells isolated from the patients' bone marrow stroma were expanded in culture and seeded onto porous hydroxyapatite (HA) ceramic scaffolds designed to match the bone deficit in terms of size and shape. During the surgical session, an Ilizarov apparatus or a monoaxial external fixator was positioned on the patient's affected limb and the ceramic cylinder seeded with cells was placed in the bone defect. Patients were evaluated at different postsurgery time intervals by conventional radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans. In one patient, an angiographic evaluation was performed at 6.5 years follow-up. In this study we analyze the long-term outcome of these patients following therapy. No major complications occurred in the early or late postoperative periods, nor were major complaints reported by the patients. No signs of pain, swelling, or infection were observed at the implantation site. Complete fusion between the implant and the host bone occurred 5 to 7 months after surgery. In all patients at the last follow-up (6 to 7 years postsurgery in patients 1 to 3), a good integration of the implants was maintained. No late fractures in the implant zone were observed. The present study shows the long-term durability of bone regeneration achieved by a bone engineering approach. We consider the obtained results very promising and propose the use of culture-expanded osteoprogenitor cells in conjunction with porous bioceramics as a real and significant improvement in the repair of critical-sized long bone defects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ten.2006.0271

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcacci, M., Kon, E., Moukhachev, V., Lavroukov, A., Kutepov, S., Quarto, R., Mastrogiacomo, M., & Cancedda, R.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli (IT)
  • Ural Orthopedic Research Institute, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
  • Ural State Medical Academy, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
  • University of Genoa (IT)
Venue
Tissue Engineering
Published
2007-05
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
947-955
ISSN
  • 1076-3279 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8690
OpenAlex
W2021164682
Cited by
589
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 63
FWCI
21.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tissue Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
bone tissue engineering, mesenchymal stem cells, osteoprogenitor cells, critical-size bone defect, Ilizarov external fixator, external fixation, bone regeneration, bone fusion
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Bioprosthesis, Bone Marrow Cells, Bone Resorption, Ceramics, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Radiography, Stem Cells, Porosity, Treatment Outcome, Stromal Cells, Durapatite, Bone Substitutes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review