The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Various Stress Patterns of Press-Fit, Ingrown, and Cemented Femoral Stems
Open accessAbstract
Finite-element analysis was used to study the general differences in load-transfer mechanisms and stress patterns of cemented, fully ingrown, proximally ingrown, and smooth press-fitted femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Identical stems were used for the noncemented configurations and a similar stem shape for the cemented configurations. In each model, bone properties and loading characteristics were equal. Stem elastic moduli were varied so that the effects of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) and titanium as different stem materials could be assessed. The load-transfer mechanism is similar for all bonded configurations but differs dramatically for unbonded stems, e.g., press-fit designs. In the bonded configurations, interface stress concentrations occur on the proximal and distal sides. Stress value depends on stem rigidity, with higher proximal stress occurring in cemented stems and higher distal stress in noncemented stems. In the press-fit stem, the interface stresses are affected more by stem shape as a geometric entity and less by stem rigidity. Considering possible postoperative failure mechanisms, such as interface loosening and cortical bone loss, titanium is expected to produce better results in noncemented stems and CoCrMo in cemented stems. Cortical stress shielding as a qualitative phenomenon is caused by all stems, particularly in the calcar region. Quantitatively, stress-shielding effects differ with each type of fixation used. Stress-shielding effects are severe in fully ingrown stems and milder in cemented stems because of the differences in stem rigidity. The proximally ingrown stem falls between the fully ingrown and cemented stems in regard to stress shielding because stress transfer is more evenly distributed along the stem and concentrated at the lower coated edge. The press-fit stem provokes calcar stress shielding only. In the midstem region the stresses in the cortex are even greater than in the natural case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty
Nagels, J., Stokdijk, M., & Rozing, P. M. (2003) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1067/mse.2003.22 · Cited by 707
Keaveny, T. M., Wachtel, E. F., Ford, C. M., & Hayes, W. C. (1994) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(94)90054-x · Cited by 330
Stress and strain distribution within the intact femur: compression or bending?
Taylor, M. E., Tanner, K. E., Freeman, M. A. R., & Yettram, A. L. (1996) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/1350-4533(95)00031-3 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- HUISKES, R.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 261
- Issue
- 261
- Pages
- 27-38
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133397251
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Various Stress Patterns of Press-Fit, Ingrown, and Cemented Femoral Stems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003086-199012000-00006
- The paper
- HUISKES, R. (1990). The Various Stress Patterns of Press-Fit, Ingrown, and Cemented Femoral Stems. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199012000-00006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.