The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carrier Systems for Bone Morphogenetic Proteins
Abstract
Bone deficits can regenerate inherently, although when the amount of bone loss exceeds a critical limit, pseudarthrosis and fibrosis occur. Therapeutic intervention either with an autograft or allogeneic bank bone are traditional options to promote regeneration to overcome critical limits. However, liabilities with traditional treatments have inspired investigators to develop alternatives, such as combinations of biomimetic scaffolds and osteogenic regulatory molecules. The class of osteogenic regulatory molecules known as the bone morphogenetic proteins has several members that stimulate bone regeneration. Therapeutic applications of bone morphogenetic proteins require a well characterized carrier system to ensure safe and effective presentation at the implant site. Several carrier systems have been used to evaluate the sustained release and implant retention of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. The carrier systems used in this study include type I collagen, poly(D,L-lactide), and deorganified bovine bone. Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 released from these systems were characterized in the rat ectopic assay. Pharmacokinetics were influenced by the implant carrier. For example, sustained release occurred with the collagen sponge. The recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 from deorganified bovine bone resulted in a burst release at the first collection interval, but thereafter, appeared to bind irreversibly to the morphogen. The poly (D,L-lactide) systems showed a dose dependent sustained release pattern. These results indicate the physicochemical characteristics of a carrier system for recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 impact the release kinetics and may have a profound influence on clinical outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bone Tissue Engineering: Hope vs Hype
Rose, F. R. A. J., & Oreffo, R. O. C. (2002) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.2002.6519 · Cited by 552
Wang, X., Wenk, E., Zhang, X., Meinel, L., Vunjak-Novakovic, G., & Kaplan, D. L. (2009) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.10.021 · Cited by 421
Localized delivery of growth factors for bone repair
Luginbuehl, V., Meinel, L., Merkle, H. P., & Gander, B. (2004) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.03.004 · Cited by 332
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins: Facts, Challenges, and Future Perspectives
Carreira, A. C., Lojudice, F. H., Halcsik, E., Navarro, R. D., Sogayar, M. C., & Granjeiro, J. M. (2014) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034513518561 · Cited by 326
Effects of protein dose and delivery system on BMP-mediated bone regeneration
Boerckel, J. D., Kolambkar, Y. M., Dupont, K. M., Uhrig, B. A., Phelps, E. A., Stevens, H. Y., García, A. J., & Guldberg, R. E. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.063 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Winn, S. R., Uludag, H., & Hollinger, J. O.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 367
- Issue
- 367 Suppl
- Pages
- S95-S106
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022409816
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carrier Systems for Bone Morphogenetic Proteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003086-199910001-00010
- The paper
- Winn, S. R., Uludag, H., & Hollinger, J. O. (1999). Carrier Systems for Bone Morphogenetic Proteins. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199910001-00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.