The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of protein dose and delivery system on BMP-mediated bone regeneration
Open accessAbstract
Delivery of recombinant proteins is a proven therapeutic strategy to promote endogenous repair mechanisms and tissue regeneration. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) has been used to promote spinal fusion and repair of challenging bone defects; however, the current clinically-used carrier, absorbable collagen sponge, requires high doses and has been associated with adverse complications. We evaluated the hypothesis that the relationship between protein dose and regenerative efficacy depends on delivery system. First, we determined the dose-response relationship for rhBMP-2 delivered to 8-mm rat bone defects in a hybrid nanofiber mesh/alginate delivery system at six doses ranging from 0 to 5 μg. Next, we directly compared the hybrid delivery system to the collagen sponge at 0.1 and 1.0 μg. Finally, we compared the in vivo protein release properties of the two delivery methods. In the hybrid delivery system, bone volume, connectivity and mechanical properties increased in a dose-dependent manner to rhBMP-2. Consistent bridging of the defect was observed for doses of 1.0 μg and greater. Compared to collagen sponge delivery at the same 1.0 μg dose, the hybrid system yielded greater connectivity by week 4 and 2.5-fold greater bone volume by week 12. These differences may be explained by the significantly greater protein retention in the hybrid system compared to collagen sponge. This study demonstrates a clear dose-dependent effect of rhBMP-2 delivered using a hybrid nanofiber mesh/alginate delivery system. Furthermore, the effective dose was found to vary with delivery system, demonstrating the importance of biomaterial carrier properties in the delivery of recombinant proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bone: Formation by Autoinduction
Urist, M. R. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.150.3698.893 · Cited by 5,546
Novel Regulators of Bone Formation: Molecular Clones and Activities
Wozney, J. M., Rosen, V., Celeste, A. J., Mitsock, L. M., Whitters, M. J., Kriz, R. W., Hewick, R. M., & Wang, E. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3201241 · Cited by 3,903
Polymers for the sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules
LANGER, R., & FOLKMAN, J. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/263797a0 · Cited by 1,182
THE ROLE OF GROWTH FACTORS IN THE REPAIR OF BONE: BIOLOGY AND CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
LIEBERMAN, J. R., DALUISKI, A., & EINHORN, T. A. (2002) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200206000-00022 · Cited by 932
Collagen sponges for bone regeneration with rhBMP-2
Geiger, M. (2003) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.010 · Cited by 751
Urist, M. R., & Strates, B. S. (1971) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345710500060601 · Cited by 743
Boden, S. D., Kang, J., Sandhu, H., & Heller, J. G. (2002) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200212010-00005 · Cited by 693
Sampath, T. K., & Reddi, A. H. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.12.7599 · Cited by 588
Ruppert, R., Hoffmann, E., & Sebald, W. (1996) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0295n.x · Cited by 558
Bessa, P. C., Casal, M., & Reis, R. L. (2008) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.74 · Cited by 549
Cited by
Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering
Yang, J., Zhang, Y. S., Yue, K., & Khademhosseini, A. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.036 · Cited by 652
Comparative stability studies of poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) and poly(ethylene glycol) brush coatings
Pidhatika, B., Rodenstein, M., Chen, Y., Rakhmatullina, E., Mühlebach, A., Acikgöz, C., Textor, M., & Konradi, R. (2012) · Biointerphases · doi:10.1007/s13758-011-0001-y · Cited by 251
Madhurakkat Perikamana, S. K., Lee, J., Ahmad, T., Jeong, Y., Kim, D.-G., Kim, K., & Shin, H. (2015) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5b01340 · Cited by 68
Bergeron, E., Leblanc, E., Drevelle, O., Giguère, R., Beauvais, S., Grenier, G., & Faucheux, N. (2012) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0008 · Cited by 51
Ehlen, Q. T., Costello, J. P., Mirsky, N. A., Slavin, B. V., Parra, M., Ptashnik, A., Nayak, V. V., Coelho, P. G., & Witek, L. (2024) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01279 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Boerckel, J. D., Kolambkar, Y. M., Dupont, K. M., Uhrig, B. A., Phelps, E. A., Stevens, H. Y., García, A. J., & Guldberg, R. E.
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 5241-5251
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045095867
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 17.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of protein dose and delivery system on BMP-mediated bone regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.063
- The paper
- Boerckel, J. D., Kolambkar, Y. M., Dupont, K. M., Uhrig, B. A., Phelps, E. A., Stevens, H. Y., García, A. J., & Guldberg, R. E. (2011). Effects of protein dose and delivery system on BMP-mediated bone regeneration. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.