The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Two- to 9-Year Outcome After Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation of the Knee
Abstract
Autologous cultured chondrocyte transplantation was introduced in Sweden in 1987 for the treatment of large (1.5-12.0 cm2) full thickness chondral defects of the knee. The clinical, arthroscopic, and histologic results from the first 101 patients treated using this technique are reported in this study. Patients were assessed retrospectively using three types of endpoints: patient and physician derived clinical rating scales (five validated and two new); arthroscopic assessment of cartilage fill, integration, and surface hardness; and standard histochemical techniques. Ninety-four patients with 2- to 9-years followup were evaluable. Good to excellent clinical results were seen in individual groups as follows: isolated femoral condyle (92%), multiple lesions (67%), osteochondritis dissecans (89%), patella (65%), and femoral condyle with anterior cruciate ligament repair (75%). Arthroscopic findings in 53 evaluated patients showed good repair tissue fill, good adherence to underlying bone, seamless integration with adjacent cartilage, and hardness close to that of the adjacent tissue. Hypertrophic response of the periosteum or graft or both was identified in 26 arthroscopies; seven were symptomatic and resolved after arthroscopic trimming. Graft failure occurred in seven (four of the first 23 and three of the next 78) patients. Histologic analysis of 37 biopsy specimens showed a correlation between hyalinelike tissue (hyaline matrix staining positive for Type II collagen and lacking a fibrous component) and good to excellent clinical results. The good clinical outcomes of autologous chondrocyte transplantation in this study are encouraging, and clinical trials are being done to assess the outcomes versus traditional fibrocartilage repair techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies
Hjelle, K., Solheim, E., Strand, T., Muri, R., & Brittberg, M. (2002) · Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery · doi:10.1053/jars.2002.32839 · Cited by 939
Self-citationvan den Borne, M. P. J., Raijmakers, N. J. H., Vanlauwe, J., Victor, J., de Jong, S. N., Bellemans, J., & Saris, D. B. F. (2007) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2007.05.005 · Cited by 554
Saris, D. B. F., Vanlauwe, J., Victor, J., Almqvist, K. F., Verdonk, R., Bellemans, J., & Luyten, F. P. (2009) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546509350694 · Cited by 503
Basad, E., Ishaque, B., Bachmann, G., Stürz, H., & Steinmeyer, J. (2010) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-009-1028-1 · Cited by 406
De Bari, C., Dell'Accio, F., & Luyten, F. P. (2004) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.11450 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Peterson, L., Minas, T., Brittberg, M., Nilsson, A., Sj??gren-Jansson, E., & Lindahl, A.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 374
- Issue
- 374
- Pages
- 212-234
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016363042
- Cited by
- 1,463
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two- to 9-Year Outcome After Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation of the Knee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003086-200005000-00020
- The paper
- Peterson, L., Minas, T., Brittberg, M., Nilsson, A., Sj??gren-Jansson, E., & Lindahl, A. (2000). Two- to 9-Year Outcome After Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation of the Knee. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200005000-00020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.