The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies
Abstract
PURPOSE: Focal chondral or osteochondral defects can be painful and disabling, have a poor capacity for repair, and may predispose patients for osteoarthritis. New surgical procedures that aim to reestablish hyaline cartilage have been introduced and the results seem promising. The purpose of this study is to provide reliable data on chondral and osteochondral defects in patients with symptomatic knees requiring arthroscopy and to calculate the prevalence of patients who might benefit from cartilage repair surgery. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective study. METHODS: One thousand consecutive knee arthroscopies were included in this study. Immediately after each arthroscopy, the surgeon completed a questionnaire providing detailed information about the findings. Chondral and osteochondral lesions were classified in accordance with the system recommended by the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS). RESULTS: Chondral or osteochondral lesions (of any type) were found in 61% of the patients. Focal chondral or osteochondral defects were found in 19% of the patients. In these patients, 61% related their current knee problem to a previous trauma, and a concomitant meniscal or anterior cruciate ligament injury was found in 42% (n = 81) and 26% (n = 50), respectively. The mean chondral or osteochondral total defect area was 2.1 cm(2) (range, 0.5 to 12; standard deviation [SD], 1.5). The main focal chondral or osteochondral defect was found on the medial femoral condyle in 58%, patella in 11%, lateral tibia in 11%, lateral femoral condyle in 9%, trochlea in 6%, and medial tibia in 5%. It has been suggested that cartilage repair surgery may be most suitable in patients younger than 40 to 50 years old. A single, well-defined ICRS grade III or IV defect with an area of at least 1 cm(2) in a patient younger than 40, 45, or 50 years accounted for 5.3%, 6.1%, and 7.1% of all arthroscopies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the contention that articular cartilage defects are common. It has the advantages of a prospective design and use of a new classification system recommended by the ICRS. This modern system focuses on objectively measurable parameters of the lesion's extent and not its surface appearance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: History, Progress, and Challenges
Berthiaume, F., Maguire, T. J., & Yarmush, M. L. (2011) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114257 · Cited by 734
Articular cartilage repair biomaterials: strategies and applications
Wang, M., Wu, Y., Li, G., Lin, Q., Zhang, W., Liu, H., & Su, J. (2024) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.100948 · Cited by 145
Takahashi, I., Matsuzaki, T., Kuroki, H., & Hoso, M. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196625 · Cited by 110
Advances and prospects in biomimetic multilayered scaffolds for articular cartilage regeneration
Fu, L., Yang, Z., Gao, C., Li, H., Yuan, Z., Wang, F., Sui, X., Liu, S., & Guo, Q. (2020) · Regenerative Biomaterials · doi:10.1093/rb/rbaa042 · Cited by 65
The osteochondral dilemma: Review of current management and future trends
Ye, K., Di Bella, C., Myers, D. E., & Choong, P. F. M. (2014) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/ans.12108 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Hjelle, K., Solheim, E., Strand, T., Muri, R., & Brittberg, M.
- Venue
- Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 730-734
- ISSN
- 0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088564623
- Cited by
- 939
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jars.2002.32839
- The paper
- Hjelle, K., Solheim, E., Strand, T., Muri, R., & Brittberg, M. (2002). Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.32839
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.