The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abnormalities of the Extracellular Matrix in Keratoconus Corneas
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study alterations of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and basement membrane (BM) components in human keratoconus corneas. METHODS: Fifteen normal and 13 keratoconus corneas were characterized by immunofluorescence with antibodies to 23 ECM and BM components. RESULTS: Keratoconus staining patterns for posterior nonscarred regions and Descemet's membrane were normal. We focused on three areas of keratoconus corneas: (a) nonscarred anterior corneal regions, (b) scarred anterior and posterior corneal regions, and (c) gaps in Bowman's layer. In each of these areas, consistent ECM and BM changes could be found. Nonscarred regions showed decreased staining of the epithelial BM for entactin/nidogen, fibronectin, alpha 3-alpha 5 chains of type IV collagen, and chains of laminin-1. In contrast, scarred regions had greater than normal staining of the epithelial BM for these same components and also for laminin-5, perlecan, and type VII collagen. In the Bowman's layer gaps/breaks, focal fibrotic deposits containing type VIII collagen, fibrillin-1, tenascin-C, alpha 1-alpha 2 type IV collagen, and normal stromal ECM and epithelial BM components were seen. Fibrotic regions were largely restricted to areas where, because of the lack of Bowman's layer, the epithelium was in contact with the stroma. CONCLUSIONS: In a single keratoconus cornea, abnormalities in the ECM/BM patterns were not uniform. This may reflect locally increased protease activity (where few if any BM components are found) and ongoing wound healing (where more BM or ECM components or both are found).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Second-Harmonic Imaging Microscopy of Normal Human and Keratoconus Cornea
Morishige, N., Wahlert, A. J., Kenney, M. C., Brown, D. J., Kawamoto, K., Chikama, T.-I., Nishida, T., & Jester, J. V. (2007) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1177 · Cited by 272
Self-citation(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 78
Elastic microfibril distribution in the cornea: Differences between normal and keratoconic stroma
White, T. L., Lewis, P. N., Young, R. D., Kitazawa, K., Inatomi, T., Kinoshita, S., & Meek, K. M. (2017) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2017.03.002 · Cited by 76
Enrichment of pathogenic alleles in the brittle cornea gene, ZNF469, in keratoconus
Lechner, J., Porter, L. F., Rice, A., Vitart, V., Armstrong, D. J., Schorderet, D. F., Munier, F. L., Wright, A. F., Inglehearn, C. F., Black, G. C., et al. (2014) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddu253 · Cited by 72
Hao, X.-D., Gao, H., Xu, W.-H., Shan, C., Liu, Y., Zhou, Z.-X., Wang, K., & Li, P.-F. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.770138 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenney, M. C., Nesburn, A. B., Burgeson, R. E., Butkowski, R. J., & Ljubimov, A. V.
- Venue
- Cornea
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345???351
- ISSN
- 0277-3740 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066471358
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abnormalities of the Extracellular Matrix in Keratoconus Corneas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003226-199705000-00016
- The paper
- Kenney, M. C., Nesburn, A. B., Burgeson, R. E., Butkowski, R. J., & Ljubimov, A. V. (1997). Abnormalities of the Extracellular Matrix in Keratoconus Corneas. Cornea. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199705000-00016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.