Cited by 58Corneal surgery and disordersCorneal Surgery and TreatmentsCollagen: Extraction and Characterization

Interlacing of collagen lamellae in the midstroma of the human cornea

Radner, Wolfgang, Mallinger, Rudolf·2002·Cornea

Abstract

Purpose To investigate by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the interlacing of collagen lamellae in the midstroma of the human cornea after opening the interlamellar spaces. Material and methods For SEM, cells and noncollagenous extracellular matrix were removed with 10% sodium hydroxide. Specimens were dehydrated in a series of graded tertiary butanols, frozen at -24 degrees C and dried in an exsiccator by sublimation of the frozen butanol. Dried corneas were cut vertically with a razor blade, and the interlamellar spaces were exposed by stretching the stroma along its anterior-posterior axis by pulling apart the inner (endothelial) and outer (epithelial) edges. Specimens were sputtered with gold and examined with a Cambridge Stereoscan 90 microscope. Results The opened interlamellar spaces gave the stroma at the cutting edge the appearance of a polymorphic honeycomb. The stromal openings differed in size, from approximately 10 microm to over 150 microm length and up to 80 microm in height. Adjacent lamellae remained connected at several interconnecting regions, either through an exchange of short merging sublamella or single fibrils. Interlacing lamellae crossed through fissures between the branches of splitting lamellae. Others crossed clefts of neighboring lamellae, and other lamellae tunneled crosswise through a horizontally split lamellae hanging in the inferior branch as in a hammock. Large interweaving zones in which a mixture of several types of interlacing…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003226-200208000-00013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mid-stromal lamellae are highly interlaced.

    “The mid-stromal lamellae are also highly interlaced (Radner and Mallinger, 2002).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Radner and Mallinger, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radner, W., & Mallinger, R.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Radner, Wolfgang
Venue
Cornea
Published
2002-08
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
598-601
ISSN
0277-3740 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2318882690
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cornea (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
Keywords
collagen lamellae, corneal stroma, interlamellar space, human cornea, corneal extracellular matrix
MeSH terms
Aged, Collagen, Corneal Stroma, Humans, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review