Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diagnostic accuracy of protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage in nosocomial pneumonia: Impact of previous antimicrobial treatments

Souweine, Bertrand, Veber, Benoit, Bedos, Jean Pierre, Gachot, Bertrand, Dombret, Marie Christine, Regnier, Bernard, Wolff, Michel·1998·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the diagnostic accuracy of bronchoscopy samples in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia is affected by prior antibiotic treatment given for a previous infection, and/or by antibiotic treatment recently started to treat suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Design: Study of critically ill patients. Setting: Intensive care unit in a university hospital. Patients: Sixty-three episodes of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia were prospectively evaluated. Based on prior antibiotic treatment, three groups were defined: no antibiotic group (no previous antibiotic treatments), n = 12; current antibiotic group (antibiotic treatment initiated >72 hrs earlier), n = 31; and recent antibiotic group (new antibiotic treatment class started within the last 24 hrs), n = 20. Interventions: Fiberoptic bronchoscopy with quantitative protected specimen brush cultures, bronchoalveolar lavage cultures, and intracellular organism counts of bronchoalveolar lavage cells. Measurements and Main Results: The diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia was made in 35 cases, based on histology (n = 2), cavitation (n = 2), blood cultures (n = 4), or outcome under appropriate antibiotic treatment (n = 27). The discriminative value of the tests, based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was high (>or=to0.85) in both current antibiotic treatment and recent antibiotic treatment patients. Sensitivities for a 5% intracellular organism count of bronchoalveolar lavage cells, a protected specimen brush culture threshold of 103 colony-forming units (cfu)/mL, and a bronchoalveolar lavage culture threshold of 105 cfu/mL were as follows, respectively, in the three groups: 0.71, 0.88, and 0.71 (no antibiotic treatment group); 0.5, 0.77, and 0.83 (current antibiotic group); and 0.67, 0.40, and 0.38 (recent antibiotic group). Specificity was consistently >or=to0.9. In the recent antibiotic group, protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage cultures had lower sensitivities (p < .05), and the best threshold values for these two tests were 102 cfu/mL and 103 cfu/mL, respectively. Conclusions: After recent introduction of an antibiotic treatment for suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia, protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage culture thresholds must be decreased to maintain good accuracy. In contrast, current antibiotic treatment prescribed for a prior infectious disease does not modify the diagnostic accuracy of protected specimen brush or bronchoalveolar lavage. (Crit Care Med 1998; 26:236-244) Nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving mechanical ventilation is a severe, common complication that increases morbidity, mortality, and ICU stay duration [1-3]. Quantitative protected specimen brush cultures with a 103 cfu/mL threshold and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cultures with a 104 cfu/mL threshold are both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. However, these thresholds were selected mainly on the basis of data from patients who had not received antimicrobial agents before specimen collection [4,5]. There is general agreement that a count of intracellular organisms of >5% in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is also strongly predictive of ventilator-associated pneumonia [5,6]. The effectiveness of these three tests for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients who are receiving antibiotic treatments has been debated [7-13]. Previous antibiotic therapy is known to affect the results of bacterial culture tests [4,7,9,14-17] and may preclude the recovery of organisms from respiratory secretions [18,19]. Many ICU patients develop ventilator-associated pneumonia while receiving antibiotic treatments for a previous infection. In this situation, the diagnostic accuracy of the microbiological results may be increased if antibiotic treatments are discontinued 48 hrs before sample collection [8]. However, antibiotic treatment discontinuation may pose undue risks. Moreover, for technical reasons, fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bacteriologic analysis are not performed on a 24-hr-a-day basis in all institutions, and, in some instances, antibiotic therapy for suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia must be initiated without delay because of a severe clinical presentation. Only a few studies [7,14,16,20] have focused on the diagnostic consequences of the timing of bronchoscopy with regard to previous antibiotic therapy. Studies have not considered how measurements derived from interventions such as protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage would be affected by the prior use of antibiotics and by the use of antibiotics as a prophylactic measure for the treatment of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. The aims of this study were to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic yields of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid intracellular organism counts, protected specimen brush cultu

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00003246-199802000-00017

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Souweine, B., Veber, B., Bedos, J. P., Gachot, B., Dombret, M. C., Regnier, B., & Wolff, M.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
1998-02
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
236-244
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990367623
Cited by
221
References
0
FWCI
14.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic accuracy of protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage in nosocomial pneumonia: Impact of previous antimicrobial treatments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003246-199802000-00017
The paper
Souweine, B., Veber, B., Bedos, J. P., Gachot, B., Dombret, M. C., Regnier, B., & Wolff, M. (1998). Diagnostic accuracy of protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage in nosocomial pneumonia: Impact of previous antimicrobial treatments. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199802000-00017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.