The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High adenosine plasma concentration as a prognostic index for outcome in patients with septic shock
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Sepsis and septic shock are a common cause of mortality in critically ill patients. Many substances have been implicated in the pathophysiology of these syndromes. We postulated that adenosine may be implicated in the sepsis- or septic shock-induced blood pressure failure. Indeed, this nucleoside is a strong endogenous vasodilating agent released by endothelial cells and myocytes under circumstances of metabolic stress, such as during critical illness. DESIGN: A prospective, comparative observational study. SETTING: The adult intensive care unit of a tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: We measured adenosine plasma concentration (APC) in patients with severe sepsis (n = 11), in patients with septic shock (n = 14), in patients with hemorrhagic traumatic shock (n = 14), and in 12 healthy volunteers. APC was evaluated every 12 hrs over 3 days. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At study entry, we found that APC was higher in patients with septic shock (mean +/- so = 8.4 +/-3.5 micromol/L) than in patients with hemorrhagic traumatic shock (1.1 +/- 0.6 micromol/L) and controls (0.8 +/- 0.3 micromol/L). Intermediate values (3.9 +/- 1.9 micromol/L) were found in patients with severe sepsis. APC in patients with traumatic shock did not differ from controls. In the course of the hospitalization, for both sepsis and septic shock patients, APC decreased significantly but remained higher than controls 72 hrs after entry into the study. In the septic shock group, APC was significantly higher in the nonsurvivor group (n = 6) than in the survivor group (n = 8), whatever the time of sample collection and assay. CONCLUSIONS: High adenosine plasma concentrations are found in patients with septic shock but not during traumatic shock, or in healthy volunteers. Intermediate values of circulating adenosine are found in patients with severe sepsis. APC may be a prognostic index for outcome in septic patients, with much higher values being found in nonsurvivors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carrier, E. J., Auchampach, J. A., & Hillard, C. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0511232103 · Cited by 497
A Metabolic Immune Checkpoint: Adenosine in Tumor Microenvironment
Ohta, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2016.00109 · Cited by 385
Thiel, M., Chouker, A., Ohta, A., Jackson, E., Caldwell, C., Smith, P., Lukashev, D., Bittmann, I., & Sitkovsky, M. V. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030174 · Cited by 287
The ‘danger’ sensors that STOP the immune response: the A2 adenosine receptors?
Sitkovsky, M. V., & Ohta, A. (2005) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2005.04.004 · Cited by 265
Vasopressin in Vasodilatory Shock
Ukor, I.-F., & Walley, K. R. (2019) · Critical Care Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2018.11.004 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, C., Leone, M., Viviand, X., Ayem, M.-L., & Guieu, R.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3198-3202
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992457570
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High adenosine plasma concentration as a prognostic index for outcome in patients with septic shock. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003246-200009000-00014
- The paper
- Martin, C., Leone, M., Viviand, X., Ayem, M.-L., & Guieu, R. (2000). High adenosine plasma concentration as a prognostic index for outcome in patients with septic shock. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200009000-00014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.