The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cerebral salt wasting: Truths, fallacies, theories, and challenges
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The reported prevalence of cerebral salt wasting has increased in the past three decades. A cerebral lesion and a large natriuresis without a known stimulus to excrete so much sodium (Na ) constitute its essential two elements. OBJECTIVES: To review the topic of cerebral salt wasting. There is a diagnostic problem because it is difficult to confirm that a stimulus for the renal excretion of Na is absent. DESIGN: Review article. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN RESULTS: Three fallacies concerning cerebral salt wasting are stressed: first, cerebral salt wasting is a common disorder; second, hyponatremia should be one of its diagnostic features; and third, most patients have a negative balance for Na when the diagnosis of cerebral salt wasting is made. Three causes for the large natriuresis were considered: first, a severe degree of extracellular fluid volume expansion could down-regulate transporters involved in renal Na resorption; second, an adrenergic surge could cause a pressure natriuresis; and third, natriuretic agents might become more potent when the effective extracellular fluid volume is high. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebral salt wasting is probably much less common than the literature suggests. With optimal treatment in the intensive care unit, hyponatremia should not develop.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Circulating Catecholamines and Sympathetic Activity after Head Injury
Clifton, G. L., Ziegler, M. G., & Grossman, R. G. (1981) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/00006123-198101000-00003 · Cited by 296 · cited 3×
“The levels of adrenergic hormones are elevated in patients with major injuries to the brain (32).”
BackgroundHigh dietary sodium chloride consumption may not induce body fluid retention in humans
Heer, M., Baisch, F., Kropp, J., Gerzer, R., & Drummer, C. (2000) · American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.2000.278.4.f585 · Cited by 285 · cited 1×
“There are recent experiments in human subjects given a large oral NaCl load (16).”
BackgroundProlonged total fasting: A feast for the integrative physiologist
Kamel, K. S., Lin, S.-H., Cheema-Dhadli, S., Marliss, E. B., & Halperin, M. L. (1998) · Kidney International · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00803.x · Cited by 47
Self-citation
Cited by
Kamel, K. S., & Halperin, M. L. (2021) · Kidney International Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2021.02.003 · Cited by 49
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, S., Bohn, D., Carlotti, A. P. C. P., Cusimano, M., Rutka, J. T., & Halperin, M. L.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2575-2579
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086521720
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.