The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Lexical Effects on Spoken Word Recognition by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were 1) to examine the effect of lexical characteristics on the spoken word recognition performance of children who use a multichannel cochlear implant (CI), and 2) to compare their performance on lexically controlled word lists with their performance on a traditional test of word recognition, the PB-K. DESIGN: In two different experiments, 14 to 19 pediatric CI users who demonstrated at least some open-set speech recognition served as subjects. Based on computational analyses, word lists were constructed to allow systematic examination of the effects of word frequency, lexical density (i.e., the number of phonemically similar words, or neighbors), and word length. The subjects' performance on these new tests and the PB-K also was compared. RESULTS: The percentage of words correctly identified was significantly higher for lexically "easy" words (high frequency words with few neighbors) than for "hard" words (low frequency words with many neighbors), but there was no lexical effect on phoneme recognition scores. Word recognition performance was consistently higher on the lexically controlled lists than on the PB-K. In addition, word recognition was better for multisyllabic than for momosyllabic stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that pediatric cochlear implant users are sensitive to the acoustic-phonetic similarities among words, that they organize words into similarity neighborhoods in long-term memory, and they use this structural information in recognizing isolated words. The results further suggest that the PB-K underestimates these subjects' spoken words recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spoken Language Development in Children Following Cochlear Implantation
Niparko, J. K. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.451 · Cited by 1,208
Early Sign Language Exposure and Cochlear Implantation Benefits
Geers, A. E., Mitchell, C. M., Warner-Czyz, A., Wang, N.-Y., Eisenberg, L. S., & the CDaCI Investigative Team (2017) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-3489 · Cited by 322
Davidson, L. S., Geers, A. E., & Nicholas, J. G. (2014) · Cochlear Implants International · doi:10.1179/1754762813y.0000000051 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirk, K. I., Pisoni, D. B., & Osberger, M. J.
- Venue
- Ear and Hearing
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 470-481
- ISSN
- 0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968054595
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lexical Effects on Spoken Word Recognition by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003446-199510000-00004
- The paper
- Kirk, K. I., Pisoni, D. B., & Osberger, M. J. (1995). Lexical Effects on Spoken Word Recognition by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users. Ear and Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199510000-00004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.