The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early Sign Language Exposure and Cochlear Implantation Benefits
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Most children with hearing loss who receive cochlear implants (CI) learn spoken language, and parents must choose early on whether to use sign language to accompany speech at home. We address whether parents’ use of sign language before and after CI positively influences auditory-only speech recognition, speech intelligibility, spoken language, and reading outcomes. METHODS: Three groups of children with CIs from a nationwide database who differed in the duration of early sign language exposure provided in their homes were compared in their progress through elementary grades. The groups did not differ in demographic, auditory, or linguistic characteristics before implantation. RESULTS: Children without early sign language exposure achieved better speech recognition skills over the first 3 years postimplant and exhibited a statistically significant advantage in spoken language and reading near the end of elementary grades over children exposed to sign language. Over 70% of children without sign language exposure achieved age-appropriate spoken language compared with only 39% of those exposed for 3 or more years. Early speech perception predicted speech intelligibility in middle elementary grades. Children without sign language exposure produced speech that was more intelligible (mean = 70%) than those exposed to sign language (mean = 51%). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the most compelling support yet available in CI literature for the benefits of spoken language input for promoting verbal development in children implanted by 3 years of age. Contrary to earlier published assertions, there was no advantage to parents’ use of sign language either before or after CI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bayley Scales of Infant Development
(2007) · Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics · doi:10.4135/9781412952644.n48 · Cited by 4,240
Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement
(2012) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_180722 · Cited by 1,566
Mitchell, R. E., & Karchmer, M. A. (2004) · Sign Language Studies · doi:10.1353/sls.2004.0005 · Cited by 1,194
Language Skills of Children with Early Cochlear Implantation
Geers, A. E., Nicholas, J. G., & Sedey, A. L. (2003) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000051689.57380.1b · Cited by 637
Self-citationFactors Associated with Development of Speech Perception Skills in Children Implanted by Age Five
Geers, A., Brenner, C., & Davidson, L. (2003) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000051687.99218.0f · Cited by 539
Self-citationDevelopment, N. I. O. C. H. &. H. (1999) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1297 · Cited by 466
Lexical Effects on Spoken Word Recognition by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users
Kirk, K. I., Pisoni, D. B., & Osberger, M. J. (1995) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199510000-00004 · Cited by 405
Predictors of Reading Skill Development in Children with Early Cochlear Implantation
Geers, A. E. (2003) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000051690.43989.5d · Cited by 361
Self-citationCochlear implants in children.
Kileny, P. R., Kemink, J. L., & Zimmerman-Phillips, S. (1991) · PubMed · Cited by 359
Spoken English Language Development Among Native Signing Children With Cochlear Implants
Davidson, K., Lillo-Martin, D., & Chen Pichler, D. (2014) · Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education · doi:10.1093/deafed/ent045 · Cited by 305
Cited by
Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective
Bragg, D., Koller, O., Bellard, M., Berke, L., Boudreault, P., Braffort, A., Caselli, N., Huenerfauth, M., Kacorri, H., Verhoef, T., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3308561.3353774 · Cited by 422
Support for parents of deaf children: Common questions and informed, evidence-based answers
Humphries, T., Kushalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Napoli, D. J., Rathmann, C., & Smith, S. (2019) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.12.036 · Cited by 113
“Other studies have concluded that the addition of signing does not contribute to better language skills [74] and some have concluded that more research is needed to determine if signing improves spoken language [75].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Geers, A. E., Mitchell, C. M., Warner-Czyz, A., Wang, N.-Y., Eisenberg, L. S., & the CDaCI Investigative Team
- Venue
- Pediatrics
- Publisher
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Published
- 2017-07-01
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-4275
- OpenAlex
- W2625912430
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 11.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Sign Language Exposure and Cochlear Implantation Benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1542/peds.2016-3489
- The paper
- Geers, A. E., Mitchell, C. M., Warner-Czyz, A., Wang, N.-Y., Eisenberg, L. S., & the CDaCI Investigative Team. (2017). Early Sign Language Exposure and Cochlear Implantation Benefits. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3489
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.