The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Energetic Consequences of Walking Like an Inverted Pendulum: Step-to-Step Transitions
Abstract
Walking like an inverted pendulum reduces muscle-force and work demands during single support, but it also unavoidably requires mechanical work to redirect the body's center of mass in the transition between steps, when one pendular motion is substituted by the next. Production of this work exacts a proportional metabolic cost that is a major determinant of the overall cost of walking.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The alternative suggestions that significant metabolic requirements exist for factors other than supporting and displacing the body's mass, such as repositioning the limbs between steps (18,27) and the trailing and leading limbs pushing against one another during double support (19,43), do not explain our results.”
From Walking economy is predictably determined by speed, grade, and gravitational load. (2017) · cites this paper as [43]
In the citing paper
“Energy cost depends considerably on mechanical work performed by the body [39], even on uneven terrain [7], but foot paths cannot capture the force or power produced by the leg.”
From Human walking in the real world: interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
In the citing paper
“greater decelerations and accelerations of the center of mass because of foot placement (Kuo et al., 2005;Seethapathi and Srinivasan, 2015)”
From Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics? (2019) · cites this paper as Kuo et al., 2005
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Alexander, 1995, Appl. Mech. Rev, 48, 461, 10.1115/1.3005107 · DOI
- Bertram, 2001, J. Theor. Biol, 209, 445, 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2279 · DOI
- Cavagna, 1975, J. Appl. Physiol, 39, 174, 10.1152/jappl.1975.39.1.174 · DOI
- Collins, 2001, Int. J. Robot. Res, 20, 607, 10.1177/02783640122067561 · DOI
- Donelan, 2001, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 268, 1985, 10.1098/rspb.2001.1761 · DOI · Paper page
- Donelan, 2002, J. Exp. Biol, 205, 3717, 10.1242/jeb.205.23.3717 · DOI · Paper page
- Donelan, 2002, J. Biomech, 35, 117, 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00169-5 · DOI
- Fukunaga, 2001, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 268, 229, 10.1098/rspb.2000.1361 · DOI
- Garcia, 2000, Dyn. Stabil. Syst, 15, 75, 10.1080/713603737 · DOI
- Kuo, 2002, J. Biomech. Eng, 124, 113, 10.1115/1.1427703 · DOI
- Kuo, 2001, J. Biomech. Eng, 123, 264, 10.1115/1.1372322 · DOI
- Kuo, 1999, Int. J. Robot. Res, 18, 917, 10.1177/02783649922066655 · DOI
- McGeer, 1990, Int. J. Robot. Res, 9, 62, 10.1177/027836499000900206 · DOI
- Mochon, 1980, J. Biomech, 13, 49, 10.1016/0021-9290(80)90007-X · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The reticular-activating hypofrontality (RAH) model of acute exercise
Dietrich, A., & Audiffren, M. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.001 · Cited by 365
An exoskeleton using controlled energy storage and release to aid ankle propulsion
Wiggin, M. B., Sawicki, G. S., & Collins, S. H. (2011) · 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics · doi:10.1109/icorr.2011.5975342 · Cited by 110
Kowalsky, D. B., Rebula, J. R., Ojeda, L. V., Adamczyk, P. G., & Kuo, A. D. (2021) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228682 · Cited by 106
Self-citationPaysant, J., Beyaert, C., Dati, A.-M., Martinet, N., & Andr, J.-M. (2006) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2005.02.0043 · Cited by 68
Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics?
Gast, K., Kram, R., & Riemer, R. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.185447 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuo, A. D., Donelan, J. M., & Ruina, A.
- Venue
- Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 88-97
- ISSN
- 0091-6331
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
