Cited by 110Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesMuscle activation and electromyography studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An exoskeleton using controlled energy storage and release to aid ankle propulsion

Wiggin, M. B., Sawicki, G. S., Collins, S. H.·2011·2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics

Abstract

Symmetric ankle propulsion is the cornerstone of efficient human walking. The ankle plantar flexors provide the majority of the mechanical work for the step-to-step transition and much of this work is delivered via elastic recoil from the Achilles' tendon - making it highly efficient. Even though the plantar flexors play a central role in propulsion, body-weight support and swing initiation during walking, very few assistive devices have focused on aiding ankle plantarflexion. Our goal was to develop a portable ankle exoskeleton taking inspiration from the passive elastic mechanisms at play in the human triceps surae-Achilles' tendon complex during walking. The challenge was to use parallel springs to provide ankle joint mechanical assistance during stance phase but allow free ankle rotation during swing phase. To do this we developed a novel `smart-clutch' that can engage and disengage a parallel spring based only on ankle kinematic state. The system is purely passive - containing no motors, electronics or external power supply. This `energy-neutral' ankle exoskeleton could be used to restore symmetry and reduce metabolic energy expenditure of walking in populations with weak ankle plantar flexors (e.g. stroke, spinal cord injury, normal aging).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icorr.2011.5975342

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 110

Metadata

Authors
Wiggin, M. B., Sawicki, G. S., & Collins, S. H.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-06
Volume
2011
Pages
1-5
ISSN
1945-7898 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135079799
Cited by
110
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
16.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
ankle exoskeleton, ankle plantarflexion, energy storage and release, parallel springs, triceps surae, gait symmetry, stroke rehabilitation, spinal cord injury, aging
MeSH terms
Ankle Joint, Biomechanical Phenomena, Electromyography, Humans, Orthotic Devices, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review