The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Echocardiography of the Aortic Root
Abstract
The echo pattern of the aortic root is elicited by locating the typical echo of the mitral valve and then angulating the transducer medially and sometimes cephalically. The characteristic echo pattern of the aortic root consists of paired undulating signals three to five cm apart. These signals move anteriorly during systole and posteriorly during diastole. Their position is central in relation to echoes arising from the mitral and tricuspid valves, corresponding to the anatomic position of the aortic root. The movement pattern is identical to the mitral annulus, which also represents a portion of the fibrous skeleton of the heart. Lesser echoes originating between the undulating margins of the aortic root were identified as arising from the valve cusps by correlating their motion with the production of the cardiac sounds. Further support was gained by recording abnormally intense and distorted signals in patients with calcific aortic stenosis. Anatomic validation of the aortic origin of these echoes was obtained by means of ultrasonic contrast injections made during radiologic studies of the aortic root. Saline was injected in the supravalvular position during continuous echocardiographic recording and was detected as a cloud of echoes limited by the parallel signals of the aortic root. Systolic movement of the aortic cusps was accompanied by the delivery of non-contrast blood from the left ventricle which produced defects in the contrast image paralleling the excursion of the linear signals from the cusps.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery
Hernot, S., & Klibanov, A. L. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.005 · Cited by 990
Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions
Lindner, J. R. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1417 · Cited by 872
Microbubbles and ultrasound: from diagnosis to therapy
DIJKMANS, P., JUFFERMANS, L., MUSTERS, R., VANWAMEL, A., TENCATE, F., VANGILST, W., VISSER, C., DEJONG, N., & KAMP, O. (2004) · European Journal of Echocardiography · doi:10.1016/j.euje.2004.02.001 · Cited by 420
A Novel Site-Targeted Ultrasonic Contrast Agent With Broad Biomedical Application
Lanza, G. M., Wallace, K. D., Scott, M. J., Cacheris, W. P., Abendschein, D. R., Christy, D. H., Sharkey, A. M., Miller, J. G., Gaffney, P. J., & Wickline, S. A. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.12.3334 · Cited by 406
Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery
Kooiman, K., Vos, H. J., Versluis, M., & de Jong, N. (2014) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.03.003 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Gramiak, R., & Shah, P. M.
- Venue
- Investigative Radiology
- Published
- 1968-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 356-366
- ISSN
- 0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011945218
- Cited by
- 930
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Echocardiography of the Aortic Root. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004424-196809000-00011
- The paper
- Gramiak, R., & Shah, P. M. (1968). Echocardiography of the Aortic Root. Investigative Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-196809000-00011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.