The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Assessment of the Muscles of the Rotator Cuff with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging standard for quantification of the muscles of the rotator cuff. METHODS: Parasagittal T1-weighted turbo spin-echo images of the shoulder were obtained in 70 asymptomatic subjects (35 women, 35 men; age range: 21-70 years, mean: 45 years). Standardized cross-sectional areas (rotator cuff muscle areas divided by the area of the supraspinatus fossa) and standardized signal intensities (related to signal intensities of the teres major muscle) were measured and compared with 30 patients with different stages of rotator cuff tears and 10 patients with glenohumeral instability. In addition, a so-called tangent sign was evaluated with the hypothesis that a healthy supraspinatus muscle crosses a line (tangent) drawn through the superior borders of the scapular spine and the superior margin of the coracoid. RESULTS: Cross-sectional areas of the muscles of the rotator cuff were variable in asymptomatic subjects. Cross-sectional areas (but not signal intensities) did discriminate patients with different stages of rotator cuff tears from asymptomatic subjects. The tangent sign was negative in all asymptomatic subjects but positive in four and nine of 10 patients with medium and large rotator cuff tears, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A method for quantification of the muscles of the rotator cuff using MR imaging is presented. Cross-sectional areas can be used for quantification of the muscles of the rotator cuff. The tangent sign is a useful MR sign for atrophy of the supraspinatus muscle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Cited by
Gerber, C., Schneeberger, A. G., Hoppeler, H., & Meyer, D. C. (2007) · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.122 · Cited by 340
Self-citationMaman, E., Harris, C., White, L., Tomlinson, G., Shashank, M., & Boynton, E. (2009) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.g.01335 · Cited by 300
Dunn, W. R., Kuhn, J. E., Sanders, R., An, Q., Baumgarten, K. M., Bishop, J. Y., Brophy, R. H., Carey, J. L., Holloway, G. B., Jones, G. L., et al. (2014) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.l.01304 · Cited by 226
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Quantitative Analysis of Rotator Cuff Muscle Volume
Tingart, M. J., Apreleva, M., Lehtinen, J. T., Capell, B., Palmer, W. E., & Warner, J. J. P. (2003) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000092969.12414.e1 · Cited by 112
Oh, J. H., Kim, S. H., Kim, J. H., Shin, Y. H., Yoon, J. P., & Oh, C. H. (2009) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.91b12.22481 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- ZANETTI, M., GERBER, C., & HODLER, J.
- Venue
- INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 163-170
- ISSN
- 0020-9996 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015312712
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Assessment of the Muscles of the Rotator Cuff with Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004424-199803000-00006
- The paper
- ZANETTI, M., GERBER, C., & HODLER, J. (1998). Quantitative Assessment of the Muscles of the Rotator Cuff with Magnetic Resonance Imaging. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199803000-00006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.