Cited by 103Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Childhood Disintegrative Disorder: Results of the DSM-IV Autism Field Trial

Open access
VOLKMAR, FRED R., RUTTER, MICHAEL·1995·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This report is concerned with the classification of children in whom an "autistic-like" syndrome develops after some years of normal development. In DSM-IV the term "childhood disintegrative disorder" (CDD) is used to describe such cases. METHOD: Data collected as part of the international, multisite DSM-IV field trial for autism and related conditions were examined and cases that met DSM-IV criteria for CDD were identified. RESULTS: In 16 cases the clinician had given a CDD diagnosis; in an additional 10 cases criteria for the condition were met even though this diagnosis was not given by the clinician rating the case. CONCLUSIONS: The available data suggest that CDD cases can be differentiated from those with autism; these two groups appear to differ in important ways. The identification of cases of CDD may be of particular importance for research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-199508000-00020

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With improvements in neurological and genetic testing, children with degenerative conditions or rare forms of epilepsy, who in earlier years might have received diagnoses of CDD, now receive more specific diagnoses (e.g., Rett syndrome) or specifiers as necessary.

    “With improvements in neurological and genetic testing, children with degenerative conditions or rare forms of epilepsy, whoin earlier years might have received diagnoses of CDD (Volkmar & Rutter 1995), now receive more specific diagnoses (e.g., Rett syndrome) or specifiers as necessary.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VOLKMAR, F. R., & RUTTER, M.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-08
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1092-1095
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147084544
Cited by
103
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
childhood disintegrative disorder, autism spectrum disorder, DSM-IV, diagnostic classification, differential diagnosis, case finding
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Institutionalization, Male, Mutism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review