Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 609

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mental Health Service Use in the Community and Schools: Results from the Four-Community MECA Study

Open access
LEAF, PHILIP J., ALEGRIA, MARGARITA, COHEN, PATRICIA, GOODMAN, SHERRYL H., HORWITZ, SARAH McCUE, HOVEN, CHRISTINA W., NARROW, WILLIAM E., VADEN-KIERNAN, MICHAEL, REGIER, DARREL A.·1996·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: To describe the use of mental health and substance abuse services by children and adolescents as reported from the four community sites included in the NIMH Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) Study.Method: As part of the MECA survey, questions were developed to identify children and adolescents utilizing mental health and substance abuse services.Youths aged 9 through 17 years and a parent/ caretaker were interviewed.Because the investigators had concerns about the capacities of the younger children in the study to describe their use of mental health services, more extensive questions were asked of parents than of youths.Results: The procedures developed by the MECA project identified patterns of service use that varied in the four communities surveyed.Agreement between reports of parents and youths regarding the use of mental health and substance abuse services showed substantial inconsistencies, similar to reports of psychiatric disorders.At three of the four sites, the majority of children meeting criteria for a psychiatric disorder and scoring 60 or less on the Children's Global Assessment Scale reported some mental health-related service in the previous year, although at two of the sites fewer than 25% of these youths were seen in the mental health specialty sector.Conclusion: Community surveys show great promise for monitoring the need for mental health and substance abuse services and for identifying patterns of use.J. Am.Acad.Child Ado/esc.Psychiatry.1996,35(7):889-897.Key Words: psychiatric disorders, child and adolescent mental health services.Policy makers, researchers, and clinicians have long been concerned about the large number of children with serious emotional disturbances who do not receive treatment for their disorders (Institute of Medicine, 1989; Joint Commission on the Mental Health of

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-199607000-00014

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 609

Metadata

Authors
LEAF, P. J., ALEGRIA, M., COHEN, P., GOODMAN, S. H., HORWITZ, S. M., HOVEN, C. W., NARROW, W. E., VADEN-KIERNAN, M., & REGIER, D. A.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-07
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
889-897
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004484865
Cited by
609
References
2
FWCI
28.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mental Health Service Use in the Community and Schools: Results from the Four-Community MECA Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004583-199607000-00014
The paper
LEAF, P. J., ALEGRIA, M., COHEN, P., GOODMAN, S. H., HORWITZ, S. M., HOVEN, C. W., NARROW, W. E., VADEN-KIERNAN, M., & REGIER, D. A. (1996). Mental Health Service Use in the Community and Schools: Results from the Four-Community MECA Study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199607000-00014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.