Cited by 1,818Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health Research Topics

Using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample

Open access
Goodman, Robert, Ford, Tamsin, Simmons, Helen, Gatward, Rebecca, Meltzer, Howart·2000·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Child psychiatric disorders are common and treatable, but often go undetected and therefore remain untreated. Aims: To assess the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) as a potential means for improving the detection of child psychiatric disorders in the community. Method: SDQ predictions and independent psychiatric diagnoses were compared in a community sample of 7984 5- to 15-year-olds from the 1999 British Child Mental Health Survey. Results: Multi-informant (parents, teachers, older children) SDQs identified individuals with a psychiatric diagnosis with a specificity of 94.6% (95% CI 94.1–95.1%) and a sensitivity of 63.3% (59.7–66.9%). The questionnaires identified over 70% of individuals with conduct, hyperactivity, depressive and some anxiety disorders, but under 50% of individuals with specific phobias, separation anxiety and eating disorders. Sensitivity was substantially poorer with single-informant rather than multi-informant SDQs. Conclusions: Community screening programmes based on multi-informant SDQs could potentially increase the detection of child psychiatric disorders, thereby improving access to effective treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.177.6.534

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The conduct problems subscale of the SDQ was the study's outcome variable, as it has been extensively used to measure aggressive behaviour and interpersonal aggression across a wide range of cultures in community, academic and clinical settings.

    “The conduct problems subscale of the SDQ was the study's outcome variable, as it has been extensively used to measure aggressive behaviour and interpersonal aggression across a wide range of cultures in community [58], academic [59] and clinical [60] settings.”

    From Violent video game engagement is not associated with adolescents' aggressive behaviour: evidence from a registered report (2019) · cites this paper as [58]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used method to capture adolescents' self-reported mental health.

    “Our study refers to the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to evaluate adolescent mental health, which is a widely used method to capture adolescents’ self-reported mental health (e.g., Goodman et al., 2000; Rotheray et al., 2014; Kersten et al., 2017; Hu and Qian, 2021; Ravens-Sieberer et al., 2022).”
  • Past research indicates that levels of daily video game play, violent game play and aggressive behaviour should all be higher in male adolescents.

    “Similarly, past research indicates that levels of daily video game play [2], violent game play [66] and aggressive behaviour should all be higher in male adolescents [58].”

    From Violent video game engagement is not associated with adolescents' aggressive behaviour: evidence from a registered report (2019) · cites this paper as [58]

    The citation [58] is attached to the expectation that aggressive behaviour is higher in male adolescents. The Sample section reports the participants’ sex distribution, and Characteristics of ‘false positives’ says SDQ false positives were more likely to be male; neither compares aggressive behaviour by sex among adolescents. Searches for aggression and sex differences found no passage addressing that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Office for National Statistics (GB)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Robert
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2000-12
Volume
177
Issue
6
Pages
534-539
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2131960572
Cited by
1,818
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 97 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 103 · 2012: 84
FWCI
16.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, child psychopathology, screening, multi-informant assessment, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, conduct disorder, hyperactivity, depression, anxiety disorders, specific phobia, separation anxiety, eating disorders, community mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Community Health Services, False Positive Reactions, Humans, Mass Screening, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review