Cited by 389Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect Size of Lithium, Divalproex Sodium, and Carbamazepine in Children and Adolescents With Bipolar Disorder

Open access
KOWATCH, ROBERT A., SUPPES, TRISHA, CARMODY, THOMAS J., BUCCI, JOHN P., HUME, JUDITH H., KROMELIS, MICHELLE, EMSLIE, GRAHAM J., WEINBERG, WARREN A., RUSH, A. JOHN·2000·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To develop effect sizes for 3 mood stabilizers--lithium, divalproex sodium, and carbamazepine--for the acute-phase treatment of bipolar I or II disorder, mixed or manic episode, in children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years.Method Forty-two outpatients with a mean age of 11.4 years (20 with bipolar I disorder and 22 with bipolar II disorder) were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of open treatment with either lithium, divalproex sodium, or carbamazepine. The primary efficacy measures were the weekly Clinical Global Impression Improvement scores and the Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS).Results Using a > or = 50% change from baseline to exit in the Y-MRS scores to define response, the effect size was 1.63 for divalproex sodium, 1.06 for lithium, and 1.00 for carbamazepine. Using this same response measure with the intent-to-treat sample, the response rates were as follows: sodium divalproex, 53%; lithium, 38%; and carbamazepine, 38% (chi 2(2) = 0.85, p = .60). All 3 mood stabilizers were well tolerated, and no serious adverse effects were seen.Conclusions Divalproex sodium, lithium, and carbamazepine all showed a large effect size in the open treatment of children and adolescents with bipolar I or II disorder in a mixed or manic episode.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-200006000-00009

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have suggested the efficacy of combination therapy (risperidone plus lithium or divalproex and lithium plus divalproex or carbamazepine) to achieve and maintain remission.

    “Further, other studies have also suggested the efficacy of combination therapy (eg, risperidone plus lithium or divalproex584 and lithium plus divalproex or carbamazepine606) to achieve and maintain remission.”

    From Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments ( CANMAT ) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders ( ISBD ) 2018 guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder (2018) · cites this paper as [606]

    The Discussion (page not available) says patients who did not respond to monotherapy frequently responded, in the authors’ clinical experience, to combinations of mood stabilizers and other agents. It does not identify lithium plus divalproex or carbamazepine as effective pairings, or report that combination therapy achieved and maintained remission; a six-month continuation protocol was still being explored. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kashani, 1987, Psychiatric disorders in a community sample of adolescents, Am J Psychiatry, 144, 584

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
KOWATCH, R. A., SUPPES, T., CARMODY, T. J., BUCCI, J. P., HUME, J. H., KROMELIS, M., EMSLIE, G. J., WEINBERG, W. A., & RUSH, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Cardinal Glennon Children’s Medical Center (US)
  • Children's Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
KOWATCH, ROBERT A.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
713-720
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022501784
Cited by
389
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
FWCI
15.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIMH (K07-MH01057, MH53799)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar disorder, mood stabilizers, lithium, divalproex sodium, carbamazepine, children and adolescents, manic episodes, mixed states, acute phase treatment, effect size, Young Mania Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression Scale, treatment response
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Age Factors, Bipolar Disorder, Carbamazepine, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Lithium, Male, Outpatients, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Valproic Acid, Antimanic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review