Cited by 57Wound Healing and TreatmentsToxin Mechanisms and ImmunotoxinsBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exotoxin A: Its Role in Retardation of Wound Healing The 1992 Lindberg Award

Heggers, John P., Haydon, Scott, Ko, Francis, Hayward, Peter G., Robson, Martin C.·1992·Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation

Abstract

Bacterial concentrations greater than 10(5) colony-forming units/gm of tissue prevent wound healing. However, it has not been determined whether it is the number of bacteria or a toxin produced by these organisms that impedes the wound healing process. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSAR), a burn wound pathogen, produces a dermonecrotic toxin, exotoxin A. Studies have indicated a role for exotoxin A in the pathogenicity of PSAR. We investigated the role of exotoxin A in the retardation of contraction. Acute granulating wounds were created on 90 Sprague-Dawley rats. The animals were equally divided into six groups and were treated topically as follows: group 1, sham: no infection, no treatment; group 2, exotoxin A; group 3, exotoxin A and antiexotoxin; group 4, autoclaved PSAR 10(6); group 5, 10(6) viable PSAR inoculated in the wound; group 6, 10(6) viable PSAR and antiexotoxin. Wound contraction was measured with the use of planimetry twice a week. Serial biopsies were performed on all wounds. Contraction rates revealed significantly (p < 0.05) retarded closure in the animals treated with exotoxin A and in the viable PSAR group when compared with the rates of the noninfected control groups. Animals treated with exotoxin A plus antiexotoxin A and those treated with live PSAR and antiexotoxin showed contraction rates identical to the control groups. These data suggest that exotoxin A in PSAR infections retards wound healing and that neutralization of the toxin restores the normal healing process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004630-199209000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heggers, J. P., Haydon, S., Ko, F., Hayward, P. G., & Robson, M. C.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Venue
Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation
Published
1992-09
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
512-518
ISSN
0273-8481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969564456
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, exotoxin A, dermonecrotic toxin, burn wound infection, wound healing, wound contraction, bacterial toxins
MeSH terms
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exotoxin A, Animals, Awards and Prizes, Bacterial Toxins, Burns, Exotoxins, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas Infections, Wound Healing, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, ADP Ribose Transferases, Virulence Factors, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review