Cited by 22Infant Development and Preterm CareLanguage Development and DisordersNeonatal and fetal brain pathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The effects of intraventricular hemorrhage on functional communication skills in preterm toddlers.

LANDRY, SUSAN H., SCHMIDT, MARCELLA, RICHARDSON, MARY ANN·1989·Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics

Abstract

A group of 24-month-old preterm toddlers (n = 27) were subdivided into three groups according to their early specific medical complications [i.e., respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), without intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), IVH (Grades I and II), and IVH (Grades III and IV]) and were matched to a group of full-term toddlers (n = 10) on socioeconomic status and mental and receptive language age. We evaluated (1) the effects of IVH on functional use of language (e.g., speech acts), and (2) the relationship of mothers' verbal attempts to stimulate children's interest in topics and toys with the communication behaviors used by the children. The preterm groups used verbalizations and gestures less frequently to express a range of functions, but were comparable to the full-term children in their use of communicative acts that served to continue interactions. Although child behaviors did not differ in relation to specific medical complications, these differences were apparent in the mothers' behavior patterns and in the relationships between mother and child behavior. Mothers' verbal maintaining behavior was strongly associated with children's use of language for the full-term and two lower risk preterm groups, but not the higher risk IVH (Grades III and IV) group. The mothers of the IVH (Grades III and IV) group showed high responsiveness to lower level child behaviors, a pattern that was not apparent in the other preterm groups for lower risk children who showed comparable delays in their functional communication development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004703-198912000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
LANDRY, S. H., SCHMIDT, M., & RICHARDSON, M. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Venue
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
Published
1989-12
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
299???306
ISSN
0196-206X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094750356
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD23800-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
Keywords
intraventricular hemorrhage, functional communication, speech acts, gestural communication, maternal responsiveness, mother-child interaction, respiratory distress syndrome, language development, preterm birth complications
MeSH terms
Brain Damage, Chronic, Cerebral Hemorrhage, Cerebral Ventricles, Child, Preschool, Follow-Up Studies, Gestures, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Diseases, Language Development Disorders, Mother-Child Relations, Neuropsychological Tests, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review