The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioral Adjustment in Children with Asthma: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
This study is a meta-analytic review of the behavioral adjustment of children and adolescents with asthma. Of 78 studies initially reviewed, 26 studies (encompassing 28 data sets), reflecting data on nearly 5,000 children with asthma (mean age = 8.4 years; 40% female), met criteria for inclusion. Effect size estimates were calculated across studies using standard methods. Separate effect sizes were calculated for internalizing and externalizing behavioral problems, degrees of asthma severity, and differences in control group used (i.e., sample controls or normative data). Results indicate that children with asthma have more behavioral difficulties than do healthy children, with the effect for internalizing behaviors being greater than that for externalizing behaviors (d(mn) = .73 vs .40). Increased asthma severity was associated with greater behavioral difficulties. Results did not differ by comparison group (healthy controls vs normative data). The findings suggest that patients with asthma, particularly children with severe asthma, should be considered at higher risk for behavioral difficulties that may necessitate psychosocial intervention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068
What i think and feel: A revised measure of children's manifest anxiety
Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1978) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00919131 · Cited by 1,741
Depression among children with chronic medical problems: A meta-analysis
Bennett, D. S. (1994) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/19.2.149 · Cited by 322
Cited by
Basch, C. E. (2011) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00632.x · Cited by 521
Behavior Problems in Children and Adolescents With Chronic Physical Illness: A Meta-Analysis
Pinquart, M., & Shen, Y. (2011) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsr042 · Cited by 371
Routine and ritual elements in family mealtimes: Contexts for child well-being and family identity
Fiese, B. H., Foley, K. P., & Spagnola, M. (2006) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1002/cd.156 · Cited by 278
Muskens, J. B., Velders, F. P., & Staal, W. G. (2017) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-017-1020-0 · Cited by 232
Asthma and depressive and anxiety disorders among young persons in the community
GOODWIN, R. D., FERGUSSON, D. M., & HORWOOD, L. J. (2004) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291704002739 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- MCQUAID, E. L., KOPEL, S. J., & NASSAU, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 430-439
- ISSN
- 0196-206X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067059559
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behavioral Adjustment in Children with Asthma: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004703-200112000-00011
- The paper
- MCQUAID, E. L., KOPEL, S. J., & NASSAU, J. H. (2001). Behavioral Adjustment in Children with Asthma: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004703-200112000-00011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.