Cited by 52Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fluoxetine: Activating and Sedating Effects at Multiple Fixed Doses

BEASLEY, CHARLES M., SAYLER, MARY E., WEISS, ALAN M., POTVIN, JANET H.·1992·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Serotonin uptake inhibitors are generally considered activating antidepressants. To assess rates and temporal patterns of activation and sedation as well as dose-effect relationships, adverse event data were evaluated from a fixed-dose study comparing placebo and fluoxetine 5, 20, and 40 mg/day in the treatment of major depressive disorder (N = 363) and two fixed-dose studies pooled together comparing placebo and fluoxetine 20, 40, and 60 mg/day in the treatment of major depressive disorder (N = 746). The adverse events nervousness, anxiety, agitation, and insomnia were considered indicative of activation; somnolence and asthenia were considered indicative of sedation. Activation and sedation were both statistically significant (p less than or equal to 0.05) treatment-emergent phenomena, but dose-effect relationships differed. Activation rates were relatively stable between 5 and 40 mg/day, and then increased at 60 mg/day. Sedation rates increased linearly to 40 mg/day and then were comparable at 40 and 60 mg/day. Discontinuations for either phenomenon were uncommon. The temporal patterns of first occurrences and persistence of activation and sedation differed. First occurrences of activation peaked early and declined over time with all doses. First occurrences of sedation also peaked early with all doses, but there may have been greater variability in first occurrences of sedation over time with lower doses. Persistent occurrences of sedation may decline less over time than…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004714-199210000-00006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 52

Metadata

Authors
BEASLEY, C. M., SAYLER, M. E., WEISS, A. M., & POTVIN, J. H.
Affiliations
Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
1992-10
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
328???333
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057826226
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
fluoxetine, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antidepressants, activation, sedation, dose-response relationship, major depressive disorder, adverse events, anxiety, insomnia, sleepiness, agitation
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Anxiety, Asthenia, Depressive Disorder, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Placebos, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep, Akathisia, Drug-Induced

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review