Cited by 107Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionMedicinal Plant Extracts Effects

Double-Blind, Controlled, Crossover Trial of Inositol Versus Fluvoxamine for the Treatment of Panic Disorder

Palatnik, Alex, Frolov, Katerina, Fux, Mendel, Benjamin, Jonathan·2001·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Only 70% of patients respond to current treatments for panic disorder, and many discontinue drugs because of side effects. myo-Inositol, a natural isomer of glucose and a precursor for the second-messenger phosphatidyl-inositol system, has previously been found superior to placebo in the treatment of depression, panic disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but a direct comparison with an established drug has never been performed. A double-blind, controlled, random-order crossover study was undertaken to compare the effect of inositol with that of fluvoxamine in panic disorder. Twenty patients completed 1 month of inositol up to 18 g/day and 1 month of fluvoxamine up to 150 mg/day. Improvements on Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety scores, agoraphobia scores, and Clinical Global Impressions Scale scores were similar for both treatments. In the first month, inositol reduced the number of panic attacks per week (mean and SD) by 4.0 (2) compared with a reduction of 2.4 (2) with fluvoxamine (p = 0.049). Nausea and tiredness were more common with fluvoxamine (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Because inositol is a natural compound with few known side effects, it is attractive to patients who are ambivalent about taking psychiatric medication. Continuing reports of inositol's efficacy in the treatment of depression, panic disorder, and OCD should stimulate replication studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004714-200106000-00014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Palatnik, A., Frolov, K., Fux, M., & Benjamin, J.
Affiliations
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Palatnik, Alex
  • Frolov, Katerina
  • Fux, Mendel
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2001-06
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
335-339
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990462691
Cited by
107
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
Keywords
myo-inositol, fluvoxamine, panic disorder, agoraphobia, panic attacks, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, natural compounds, adverse drug reactions, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Inositol, Male, Middle Aged, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Chi-Square Distribution, Single-Blind Method, Panic Disorder, Fluvoxamine, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review